Clintons4mccain.com getting hotter
June 11th, 2008 - 10:03 pm ICT by David M N James -
Clinton4McCain is getting red hot as more millions of frustrated Hillary Clinton supporters have ganged up with republicans with one strong voice which says “We Will Not Vote for Obama Period.” Everyone at the site is up in arms against Barrack Obama. They have refused to admire Obama’s efforts to bring people of all colors, genders, cultures and religions together for one unifying coalition and flatly said there’s no deal anyway.
The forum clinton4mccain.com is aimed at drawing every democrat who supported Hillary Clinton to refuse Clintons call to support Obama and back Republican John McCain. McCain is seen widely as a favorite to many since he is White and the racist White community might not favor Obama in spite of him trying to consolidate their vote. The clinton4mccain.com site has born the justsaynodeal.com which is seeking to increase the no deal with Obama. It is widely viewed as a Clinton supporter’s campaign and revenge against Obama who won the Democrats presidential bid in a highly hyped campaign. This is an outright Clinton for McCain campaign since even top financiers of Hillary Clinton are featuring in the website clinton4mccain.com
Posted in Politics, World, World News, |
June 12th, 2008 at 9:01 am
We cannot support Obama and his Lefty, Extremist base. As Liberal-Centrists, we feel much safer with John McCain, who never gave Hillary the bird!
Democrats 4 McCain
June 12th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Thank you. It’s time that people are not owned by party but are free to vote for the person of their choice.
June 12th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
i think Mr.Barrack Obama is going to be the best president for the USA, DUE TO THE TPYE OF CALIBRE,AND THE SENSE OF HOUMOR THAT HE REPRESENTS TO HIMSELF AND OTHERS.HE IS THE CHANGE,THE FLOWER,& THE LIGHT THE USA HAS BEEN WAITING FOR.PEOPLE NEED TO ACCEPT THAT HE IS THEE 1st BLACK AMERICAN PRESIDENT.
June 12th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
NObama is the goal; he’s the biggest predator out there.
If America doesn’t wake up…they may not get the opportunity
June 13th, 2008 at 2:41 am
John McCain is honorable, a true american hero. He has the experience to lead this country on day one. I don’t know who Obama is and that is a real problem he has with many americans. I am not longer a democrat. I will vote for the best person for the job - that is John McCain.
June 13th, 2008 at 3:37 am
I switched from 40 years as a Democrat to Republican to get as far away from every anti American element Obama represents. America will beat him back in all fifty states.
June 13th, 2008 at 3:49 am
I feel that the Democratic Rules Committee was unethical for taking 4 votes away from Clinton and giving them to Obama along with 55 votes for uncommitted. I can no longer support the Democrat Party and have joined the Republicans.
June 13th, 2008 at 5:10 am
I AM NOT A OBAMA SUPPORTER, I SUPPORTED HILLARY CLINTON BUT TODAY I HEAR THE POLLS ARE SHOWING OBAMA IS WINNING THE WHITE WOMEN VOTE. HOW CAN THIS BE,IF WE HILLARY VOTERS ARE SAYING NO TO OBAMA. I WANT TO STAND WITH THE CLINTONS 4 MCCAIN ,WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE. WITH THESE POLLS THE ONLY POLL I CAN FIND IS AOL AND MCCAIN IS LEADING BUT MSNBC AND CNN ARE SAYING OBAMA IS LEADING.WHERE IS THE POLLS,I WANT TO VOTE FOR MCCAIN.
June 13th, 2008 at 5:24 am
This group is actually a front group for the RNC.
If that weren’t obvious enough from a quick perusal of their site or myspace/facebook pages or from the appearances of Cristi Adkins on Hannity or Cavuto, then one can just check over at register.com and see that the domain name clintonsformccain was registered on May 15 with the registrant listed as…wait for it…The Republican national Committee.
Wired magazine picked up on this, queried the RNC (no answers) and then published an article on this dated June 5.
Obviously alerted to this dullard error of transparency, The RNC dropped the ‘clintonsformccain’ domain name and re-registered as ‘clintons4mccain’ but this time hiding their affiliation.
One goal, of course, is to sew dissent between Hillary and Obama supporters in the hopes of cutting away some portion of the female vote and shifting it over to McCain.
Another clear goal, utterly evident when you go to these linked sites, is to spread every racist and bigoted smear of Obama these folks can dig out of their un-attractive minds. It’s pretty ugly stuff.
June 13th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Blatham: Do not try to misinform people. Cristi Adkins is a true Hillary supporter very upset with what the DNC have done as many of us are. Clintons4mccain site has nothing to do with the RNC. I do not doubt they try to set up a similar site before because it is convenient for them but this one is not the same one.
June 13th, 2008 at 9:34 pm
Daisies
On another board, where you are doing the same propagandist schtick, I asked you…
“Perhaps, Daisies, you could elucidate the key elements of Hillary’s policy proposals which you’ve found so compelling that Hillary has your support?”
You didn’t respond. Perhaps you’d like to do so here. After all, your passionate support suggests strong policy and ideological bonds with Hillary. We’ll note that Cristi Adkins, in her interviews (only on Fox, huge surprise) also fails to name any single aspect of Clinton’s platform with which Cristi agrees. What comes out of her mouth is RNC/conservative boilerplate…
- “the DNC has been high-jacked by the far Hollywood left”
- “Obama is so far to the radical left…”
- “Fox is fair and balanced”
- “demand your donations to the DNC be returned and then send them to McCain”
You guys are just too transparent, daisies. And not terribly bright, nor careful.
The Wired magazine piece that initially exposed this scam is here… http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/republican-nati.html
You guys have two myspace pages up, both about as sleezy as it gets in American politics. Unfortunately, one still has the “clintonsformccain” url, not the new improved “clintons4mccain” url.
June 13th, 2008 at 10:17 pm
For the last time Blatham:
My passionate support for Hillary suggests policy but also her character, experience, leadership, credibility, reliability and these are points that I can see in McCain also, unlike your hero Obama.
“the DNC has been high-jacked by the far Hollywood left”
“Obama is so far to the radical left…”
“Fox is fair and balanced”
TRUE VERY TRUE…
You are right, I might not be very bright, but I will vote for McCain – What is the problem? When I find people like you – I know who you are, I feel even more inspired to work for McCain and get more people to join our cause.
From now on I will ignore your stupidity; you just want to get points with your boss.
Daisis
Owner of Advertising Business
Somewhere, NC
June 13th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Daisies
“Brightness” has nothing to do with whom you choose to vote for. I’m completely happy if you vote for John McCain. I’m completely happy if you organize for John McCain.
As a simple matter of honesty and integrity, I’m considerably less happy with your deceits and pretences. Not to mention the racism and bigotry that marks Cristi’s various sites.
Where “you” (by whom I mean the covert RNC operation that you and the other Rush Limbaugh fans are clearly engaged in here) aren’t ‘bright’ is as regards how obvious you are in your rhetoric and strategies. It’s rather like a bad junior high operetta.
As regards “my boss”, not likely to be an American political figure as I’m Canadian though now living in Portland with my wife. We’ve donated to both Obama and Hillary but Hillary got 10X what we sent to Obama (an even smaller bit to Al Franken as well).
June 14th, 2008 at 12:13 am
Thank you for mentioning our cause.
There are three reasons Pumas are protesting the Democratic selection of 2008.
The 3 reasons are:
the blatant unfairness and bias by the DNC in stacking the deck for Obama over Hillary; the unrelenting sexism and hatred from the media against a distinguished US Senator running for office; and the failure of the DNC and public officials to take a firm stand against the despicable treatment of one of their own best candidates and leaders.
Please visit and continue to report on the progress of our movement to regain control of our political party.
blog.pumapac.com
Please note: some of the Puma websites are under siege by nobama hackers and may be inaccessible for viewing. Please keep checking back.
Thank you,
June 14th, 2008 at 1:28 am
Beverly notes: “…the unrelenting sexism and hatred from the media against a distinguished US Senator running for office”
“Unrelenting” is a gross exaggeration but the point has merit. Sexist sentiment, conscious and unconscious, has been a seriously depressing part of the response to Hillary’s campaign.
But, Ms Beverly, I’d be interested in seeing you address the instances of precisely this sort of sexism as it has manifested in O’Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Kristol, Gibson, etc.
Please proceed.
June 14th, 2008 at 2:39 am
Daisies and Beverly, Don’t stop
You speak for millions and
millions.
Blatham. Al Franken owes federal taxes in 17 states. If you don’t think Obama is a communist you should go live in Cuba, North Korea or China. We don’t need your kind in the USA.
June 14th, 2008 at 3:14 am
Jeanne darlin…you give yourself away.
June 14th, 2008 at 5:14 am
I would like to ask a simple question, just why are you proObam bigots posting on a site that clearly opposes him, his supporters and the way they savaged Hillary.
Your rediculous comments serve to even further aleniate and rejuvenate us!
We are not the Lemmings(Sheeple) who bought the Obama-DNC line hook line and stinker.
Jack
June 14th, 2008 at 11:25 am
jack kashinsky
As I noted above, my wife and I gave 10X in donations to Hillary’s campaign as compared to Obama’s campaign. As a matter of fairly simple arithmetic, that makes us Hillary supporters.
You use the term “bigot” in reference to me, it seems. Could you please pick whichever dictionary definition of that term you deem applies and give the instance where I match that definition. Again, a rather simple exercise. I’m sure you are up to it.
As to “savaging Hillary”. Surely some Obama ’supporters’ have been utter dicks. It’s a factor of modern American political life. And there have been folks in the media who have clearly been sexist in their treatment of Hillary.
Here’s an interesting example of Hillary being “savaged” in a particularly repugnant case of disrespect and sexism, it’s from a June 11 radio broadcast. It’s an opinion of what Hillary will do to you if you betray her and go with Obama…
************
You know, if you’re backing the “hope” guy, well, that’s too bad for you, and it will be too bad for you because girlfriend will cut you. She will strap you into the electric chair. Then she will waterboard you. Then she will slowly and methodically pull off each one of your toenails. Then she will deprive you of sleep by blasting “The Best of the ’80s Hair Bands” at you, and then she will cut off your manhood, and then she will throw the switch…I am Monica Crowley in for Laura Ingraham.
***********
Isn’t that just special? You know, as regards a portrayal of Hillary’s character.
June 17th, 2008 at 8:21 am
I am so glad that I take America for what it is, this is a free country and I don’t need To follow anybody because of their gender, race or even because they were a war hero, to be honest the best war heros are those that are humble and don’t try to use it for their personal gain to get jobs it should be about defending America only. A hero who suffers for America and let others tell their story and don’t try to take ownership on the military just because. I know what you are thinking, but my husband is US Army retired. If Hillary was nominated I wouldn’t vote for her because she is so ghetto and does not represent a real woman.
June 18th, 2008 at 3:51 am
We don’t want or need a rock star like Obama for president. He wants to raise the capital gain, raise our taxes, has poor judgement in his associations, has no experience with foreign affairs, We need a president to keep our country safe and secure like Mccain. He has fought for our country, his sons are fighting for our country. We had not had a successful attack on our country since 9/11. We did not get that on luck only. Other countries are thinking twice before they attack un again. Our whole country’s future is in the hands of the next president.
June 18th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
John McCain…ya gotta love his sensitivity to womens’ place in culture and politics. Ya gotta love his respect for Hillary. Ya gotta love his sense of humor too.
As in when he laughed on receiving the question, “How do we beat the bitch?” Golly, that’s funny.
As in when he referred to his wife (in front of at least five witnesses) as a c*nt. That’s some straight talk.
And his hilarious knee-slapper, “Do ya know why Chelsea is so ugly? Janet Reno is her dad.”
John is surely bound to get women just tumbling into the voting booth to punch his name.
June 19th, 2008 at 12:30 am
Bill Clinton and Monica, Obama and Larry Sinclair, and McCain said Chelsea is ugly - what does it has to do with being capable to run the greatest country in the world? Year and a half in the senate (Obama has been over 16 month campaigning now) does not give Obama enough experience to be our president.
Hillary has it, McCain has it. If Hillary does not make it, McCain is my choice - If he said c**t to his wife and she did not have a problem with it, I do not either.
Go Hillary, go McCain…
Daisies
Not very bright Hillary supporter that in case she can’t get the nomination (Obama is still the presumptive nominee) will definitely vote for McCain in November. Yes!
June 19th, 2008 at 4:00 am
Your comment referring to “dicks” and attempting to take your boy off the hook is insulting.
It was not the “dicks” that attacked Hillary so savagely that three other Dem. Debate participants had to ask him to cool it. It was not the “dicks” who rudly pivited away when Hillary offefred her hand in friendship at another debate. It was not just the “dicks” who gave Hillary the bird at the last debate.
Jack
June 20th, 2008 at 12:47 am
Daisies and Jack Kashinsky…how nice to see you again.
Daisies…please, vote for whoever you like and indeed, organize for whoever you like. But let’s stop the pretense that you were or or a Hillary supporter. It doesn’t reflect well on your character.
Elsewhere, Jack has noted that he is a Co-ordinator at Cristi’s clintons4mccain.com site… http://sobeale.blogspot.com/2008/06/hey-cristi-adkins-vol-2.html
As we’ve noted earlier, the original domain name of clintonsformccain.com was registered by the Republican National Committee on May 15.
But golly, you both could easily redeem your credibility through simply listing some of the key Hillary platform positions and political philosophies which define her candidacy.
As you both, along with everyone else in the universe understands, Hillary’s position on women’s choice, Iraq, Supreme Court nominees, international relations, the UN, diplomacy, etc etc are 180 degrees in opposition to John McCain’s positions.
Further, as those sexist (and anti-Hillary quotes) from McCain I’ve noted above suggest, John is hardly a steadfast supporter of women’s dignity.
So really all you have to do, to, you know, make yourselves at least appear not to be lying through your teeth as to what you are really up to, is to lay out in some coherent manner (be brief, that’s fine) the ways in which you align yourselves to Hillary’s politics. I mean you must, being such passionate supporters.
Please, procede. The rest of us will wait.
June 21st, 2008 at 3:33 am
For Blatham,
Get a life. No one has to agree with you no matter how many posts you make. Find something else to do instead of replying to everyone’s comments over and over again. Quit commenting on people’s character flaws when I am positive you have many. Obama is a liar and despite that he is half blk and half wht, he can still favor one race above the other and therefore, still be a prejudiced guy even if he is seen by many as the first black possible president. Not one of his supporters can claim that he truly stands for one thing or the other and most of the media is afraid to attack him hard enough for fear of a racist label backlash. If he is not qualified by his credentials alone to be president, and he is not, then who gives a crap what color he is. He is not presidential material just because he delivers a speech on racism the day after his racist minister of the last 20 years is outed. that is not integrity, that is someone trying to avert his racist beliefs into a squeaky clean uniter image. He is all smoke and mirrors and although he is educated, he lacks enough experience to lead a nation, especially, this one.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:52 am
More Osama-like lies. I NEVER STATED, OR WRITE anything to the effect that I co-sponsored anything with my good friend Christie.
Perhaps you also believe, along with your mentor, that the US is composed of 57 States!
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:10 am
We Hillary supporters, while not agreeing with all of John McCain’s political posture, know that he is as honest as the thug from Kenya, Indonesia, and God knows where else, is not.
John McCain risked his life and lost full control of his arms because he refused to depricate our flag, his buddies and provide the Communists information that he knew would be harmful to his country.
What did Obama do, refuse to sign on to a bill protecting our patriotic citizens sensitivities to flag desecration!
He is such a hypocrit that he now wears the flag pin, and salutes the flag…whenever it is his political advantage to do so.
Our veterans. their friends and famalies will remember this happy horse manure come Election Day.
Jack
June 23rd, 2008 at 6:06 am
Jack Kashinsky says above:
“More Osama-like lies. I NEVER STATED, OR WRITE anything to the effect that I co-sponsored anything with my good friend Christie.”
Jack Kashinsky posted, at the link I noted above in post #25:
****************************
“The fact of the matter is that many of us Hillary supporters have been repulsed at the lies, misstatements, and male macho crap that you, Obama and his Campaign have been savaging Hillary with. It is this that has driven us away from your annointed one and into the welcome arms of John McCain. A gentleman who is as honest as your fearless leader is not.
Jack Kashinsky
Coordinator,
NY Clintons 4 McCain
jack kashinsky | 06.18.08 - 4:06 pm | #
*****************************
I really don’t mind if you guys want to vote for McCain or if you want to organize for McCain or even if you want to make thoughtful critical comments regarding matters of policy and politcal philosophy. But that’s not what you are doing here or elsewhere
What you are doing is pretending to be Democrats or Independents or supporters of Hillary while actually running a covert propaganda action for the RNC. You’ve been busted already.
Perhaps because you folks live within the extremist rightwing media environment you no longer have any conception of how easy it is to identify who you are and what you are up to. The terms you use, the cliches that fall off your keyboards, and the inability you continually demonstrate to actually tackle difficult political or ideological questions.
The challenge I presented to you in my previous post was both civil and fair. It was also honestly intended though I confess I expected you guys/ladies would not be willing or able to meet the challenge precisely because you are lying and therefore cannot engage such a discussion.
When you folks try to play the political game in this sort of dishonest manner, you do great disservice to democracy, to America and to God. As a matter of integrity, it is everyone elses’ duty to point this up and take you to task.
But once again, if I am wrong in my assumptions of you, I’m completely willing and happy to engage any of you in a careful discussion on Hillary’s policies and, for example, how they relate to or do not relate to traditional American liberalism or conservatism.
How brave are you folks?
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:05 pm
IMPORTANT!!!!!
The Obama campaign placed a website into the John McCain site. I noticed that when I went to the site as a link for John McCain.com. The things it was saying on the link was smearing JM and it surprized me that something like that would be placed on his site. Stuff like calling his wife a C–T. This a the worst smear ever. So when they say that McCain site changed it changed because the Obama troll had gotten into his website. So do not believe what some have said above because it is not true. The trolls are up to no good again.
June 24th, 2008 at 7:58 am
d55may
I’m afraid your post isn’t very coherent.
That McCain referred to his wife as “trollop” and “c*nt” comes from a claim in Cliff Schecter’s book “The Real McCain” http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_temper_boiled_over_in_92_0407.html
So far as I can tell, Schecter has three sources, each unnamed. That’s probably not good enough so I won’t repeat the charge again. I expect it is true, but what I expect/suspect is not relevant.
On the other hand, we do know that ten years ago, at a Republican fund raiser, McCain did crack the big funny “Chelsea is so ugly because her father is Janet Reno”. It was reported in numerous papers and McCain apologized to the Clinton’s for it… http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html
June 27th, 2008 at 6:35 am
Clintons4McCain Mission Statement
We Are Volunteers Dedicated to Bringing You The Real Barack H. Obama, Our Mission Statement:
Many new web sites and blogs and organizations are springing up all over the internet and banning together. What sets Clintons4McCain and ‘The List’ apart from the rest is that we focus primarily on a few main topics that require immediate attention with the sole purpose of educating the public, ensuring we have fair and just politics and restoring true democracy to our union.
We are dedicated to taking action, educating the public and bringing you a vetted political process.
Thomas Jefferson said, “The price of democracy is eternal vigilance”
We believe our founders meant the government to be one of the people for the people and by the people not ‘of the party for the party and by the party.’
The subscribers of Clintons4mccain and ‘The List’ while concerned about party issues are more concerned about Democratic process that has been abrogated.
“Should the ISSUES or policies, that have come to define the Democratic Party to democrats, be the reasoning we accept the party’s selected candidate? Even if it means sacrificing such values of respect, honor, loyalty and democracy itself?
We are told to vote for a democrat to protect the Supreme Court, abortion, environment and human rights, issues, but what if it is fear mongering designed to keep us in line?
What if issues usurp democracy as a means of achieving a goal of power over the concerned governed? Should it be rewarded with your vote by going with the party and in this case their selected not elected candidate? If citizens fall in line have they sold the long term goals of their values, for the temporally “hold us in line” issues that keep us fighting among ourselves and under control?
These are salient questions to ponder because Americans are being asked to vote for a democratic candidate in November that was not elected by the majority of voters.
Democrats are being asked to Unite in the name of the party while the party did not a thing to help one of the best and strongest candidates during this primary. Why? We leave this for you to ponder and hopefully, begin asking question and challenge what just transpired in the democratic primary…AKA Votergate 06”
Patriots serve the Constitution. The Founders designed a system of checks and balances. One of the Rules we abide by is the First Amendment.
This indeed is our time- if not now when? If not us who?
YES WE CAN BE FREE OF PARTY RULES!
NOBAMA! WE the PEOPLE -say Free US Now !
Written by: Bettyjean Kling M.S., M.Ed and Cristi Adkins, RN Cht
June 27th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
Surely, C4M, you could make some effort towards answering blatham’s questions instead of regurgitating your Swift Boat-wannabe’s website mission statement?
June 27th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
(Mishyana = tmcm)
Wow. You guys certainly make no attempt to hide your loyalties on your YouTube channel. But then, I’m sure it’s nothing but coincidence that all of Cristi’s media appearances are on Fox News…
June 27th, 2008 at 11:09 pm
Great statement Clintons4McCain! Every day more people is join the movement. Time to stop the arrogance of those who think they own the party: Nancy Pelosi (I cannot digest her) Howard Dean and Donna Brazille. And for those who find funny Cristi’s media appear in Fox, let me tell you that last night Cynthia Ruccia (Just Say No Deal) was on Larry King Live CNN. Folks, the movement is growing as well the worries on “the other side”. Go Clintos4McCain, Pumas, Just Say No Deal!
June 28th, 2008 at 1:08 am
Blatham: That is not true. The site Clintons for McCain was a scam. I entered that site thinking it was what it said it was, but found it was a Obama web site. You could tell because of the trolls and the reading content. It was saying all kinds of negative things about McCain and I pointed that out to his web site contact person. The site was removed from the RNC because the Obama people pretended to be one of us, as soon as this was found out the site was removed. So do not believe this crap that Blatham is putting out.
June 28th, 2008 at 1:13 am
CNN and MSNBC are corrupt stations (in the tank) and have not been fair or balanced throughout the entire primary process. they are the worst abusers of Mrs. clinton over the last year and they continue to do it.
June 28th, 2008 at 8:02 am
d55May said:
***************
Blatham: That is not true. The site Clintons for McCain was a scam. I entered that site thinking it was what it said it was, but found it was a Obama web site. You could tell because of the trolls and the reading content. It was saying all kinds of negative things about McCain and I pointed that out to his web site contact person. The site was removed from the RNC because the Obama people pretended to be one of us, as soon as this was found out the site was removed. So do not believe this crap that Blatham is putting out.
******************
AboutUs: CLINTONSFORMCCAIN.COM
Registrant:
Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
US
Domain Name: CLINTONSFORMCCAIN.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Republican National Committee dns@rnchq.org
310 First Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
US
202-863-8500 fax: 202-863-8851
Record expires on 15-May-2010.
Record created on 15-May-2008.
Database last updated on 27-Jun-2008 20:17:14 EDT.
***************
And as “clintonsformccain” was never activated, your visit there was clearly powered by magical powers. I salute your powers.
You indict MSNBC for “abuse” of Hillary. Actually, I agree. Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson and Joe Scarborough all used sexist and derogatory expressions/descriptions re Hillary. My wife and I wrote letters of complaint to MSNBC. Of course, we’d be sloppy if we didn’t note that two of these men are Republicans. As to CNN, I didn’t witness such sexism but I may have missed it.
On the other hand, here’s Monica Crowley describing how Hillary would sexually mutilate then murder her ‘enemies’…
**************
You know, if you’re backing the “hope” guy, well, that’s too bad for you, and it will be too bad for you because girlfriend will cut you. She will strap you into the electric chair. Then she will waterboard you. Then she will slowly and methodically pull off each one of your toenails. Then she will deprive you of sleep by blasting “The Best of the ’80s Hair Bands” at you, and then she will cut off your manhood, and then she will throw the switch. This is what Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Bill Richardson, Oprah, and Maria Shriver all have to look forward to. None of them should be starting their personal cars in the morning. 800-876-4123. Monicamemo.com. I am Monica Crowley in for Laura Ingraham.
**************
Or, from Rush…
“She sounds like a screeching ex-wife”
Fun stuff, no?
June 28th, 2008 at 9:48 am
Daisies, there’s not so much fear, as there is bafflement. At any rate, I suspect your ‘movement’, even if it were all that genuine, has about as much push behind it as Republicans who intend to vote for Obama.
So the universe balances out in the end…
June 29th, 2008 at 1:30 am
Blatham, Mishyana please G E T A L I F E. You guys are becoming paranoiacs. Let’s see… I bet you work for OIU(Obama Investigation Unit). LOL
FYI a large group of Clinton Democrats for McCain are getting more media recognition every day. If you want to think Republicans are behind it, I will not argue, you are free to think whatever you want. My truth is that I have been a Democrat all my life and I am an Independent now. I will vote for the best person for the job and that is John McCain. I will not vote for a party who has let me down in so many ways so many times. I did fall in line with John Kerry (I did not even like him) but not this time. Every time I remember the arrogant and disrespectful way Obama was brushing the dirt off his shoulder referring to Hillary at one of his stupid rallies, that did it for me among many other things.
Don’t tell me about policies, he thinks one way now and hours later he comes up with a total different version. No integrity, not honor, not a man of his word.
Mishyana we agree on one thing, at the end, the universe will be fair and balance.
Great Job Clintons4McCain!
June 29th, 2008 at 10:12 pm
daisies
Just so you know…
Cristi has no record of supporting Hillary until about a month and a half ago when she first signs up at Hill’s website May 18. Passionate supporter cristi.
Further, there’s no record of any donation to Hillary’s campaign until, surprise, the second quarter of this year.
Vote for whomever you want to. That’s as it should be.
But I’m afraid there is simply no reason to credit Cristi Adkin’s statements regarding what she is up to. There is every reason to assume that she’s operating solely and only in alignment with Republican/conservative goals and organizations.
July 1st, 2008 at 9:27 pm
It makes no sense at all that such strong supporters of “leftist, liberal” Hillary Clinton now suddenly become rapid supporters of John McCain and vehemently disliking “leftist, liberal” Barak Obama. Unless… unless… unless… the Clintons4mccain doggies are:
(1) Republicans masquerading as democrats.
(2) KKK-style racists masquerading as human beings.
There’s just no other way to explain the level of vitriole.
It’s kind of like the Supreme Court Justice (was it William O Douglas) saying in the 1960’s that you can’t define pornography but you know it when you see it.
Similarly, I smell a scam here… a Clintons4mcCain kind!
September 5th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
All you passionate lifelong Dems and Hillary supporters pleased as punch with the nomination of Palin, whose far right political ideology stands at complete and profound odds with everything Hillary has fought for over the years?
Betcha are.
October 4th, 2008 at 11:21 am
American President should always be Anglo Saxon Christian; just like an Israeli President be Jewish and Egyptian President a Muslim and and an Indian Prime Minister a Hindu/Jain/Sikh.Obama’s father was not even a US citizen. Obama is half Muslim and Half Christian although he does not want to acknowledge his Islamic heritage. I like Obama but as Senator.
Raj
November 1st, 2008 at 10:08 am
Well, here we are just four days away.
And you poor folks, Kashinsky particularly, have lost big time. I am utterly without sympathy. You tried a covert game, jam-packed with falsehoods, and you got run over.
November 2nd, 2008 at 12:01 pm
you all are followers and not leaders, dividers and not conquerers. Ignorant and not smart. Raj who died and left you to be the judge.