Cat Leash Law In Barre Ignites Divisions

June 18th, 2010 - 7:40 pm ICT by Pen Men At Work  

ph2010061604580 June 18, 2010 (Pen Men at Work): An article in a law of Barre city that necessitates cats to be on leashes has ignited a heckling contest among the admirers of the free-roaming cats. A City Council discussion on Tuesday night that had cats on its list of items magnetized a massive cluster of 30 individuals. There was a female among them, who emerged with a placard that shouted that wrongdoers and not cats must be incarcerated. The placard queried whether Barre could have the funds for a prison for cats.

City bureaucrats have mentioned that some remonstrations have emerged from a few residents about a wandering cat that converted a neighbor’s garden into a litter box. Cities throughout America and one state in particular have ratified or analyzed cat restraint laws. In 1949, the Illinois Legislature endorsed an Act to defend insectivorous birds by restraining cats. However, this Act was subsequently rejected by the then Governor Adlai Stevenson.

In Barre, the hullabaloo surrounding felines commenced in the previous week when the city officials reassessed animal control regulations in order to revise them. Mayor Thomas Lauzon then declared that a rephrasing of the draft would signify a prohibition on cats from wandering.

Standpoints of the populace of Barre were diverse on the issue of debarring cats from roaming. Cheyenne Roberts, who happens to be the co-owner of the Pit Stop Diner in Barre, has mentioned that strolling with a cat on leash sounds extremely preposterous. Thad Cochran of close by Plainfield issued this response. The response was that, if dogs can have a leash, then cats should also follow.

Lauzon asserted that no person on the Council desired the restraining of cats. Lauzon, however, claimed that a thorough analysis of the existing law, enacted in 1973, actually debars cats from roaming. The law asserts that the proprietor of any animal shall not permit his pet to be on the loose.

Some cat proprietors have emphatically stated that cats provide constructive service to the urban zones in the field of vermin control. Cats are quite hygienic vis-à-vis their scatological functions.

The American Bird Conservancy, which organizes a ‘Cats Indoors!’ movement, has mentioned that scientists have calculated that free-roaming cats slaughter countless birds, tiny mammals, reptiles and amphibians each year. Cat predation is an additional pressure on the wildlife populace that is already battling to endure habitat vanishing, environmental contamination, pesticides, and other human aggressions.

Mayor Lauzon has also clarified that the city may have to settle for a concession ordinance that will demand that cats sport collars with labels that point to their proprietors. The tags will also have to indicate that their rabies shots were state-of-the-art. Proprietors will have to endure economic penalties only if their wandering cats were labeled a source of annoyance.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in World News |

Subscribe