Women sue Virgin Airlines after firm sacks them over pregnancy
February 23rd, 2011 - 3:05 pm ICT by ANIMelbourne, Feb 23 (ANI): Two women, who were allegedly sacked by their employer Virgin Blue because they were pregnant, have now decided to sue the airline.
According to the Daily Telegraph, both had lost their positions in the public affairs department in the same week.
The two women, who had 16 years of service to Virgin Blue between them, claim they were forced into redundancy in mid-2010 without any consultation.
One of the women, who asked not to be named, was told there were no suitable positions that would suit her “specialist skills” after nine years service with the airline.
She had previously taken 12 months maternity leave in 2005 following the birth of her first child.
The other woman, who was on maternity leave for four months, was then asked to do part time work for four months.
After this she was then requested to take the rest of employed for seven years with the company, returned to work on a part-time basis following 18 months of maternity leave.
She was asked by her employer to increase her position to full-time two months later and accepted.
She says two months later, she was told her position was no longer required, despite Virgin Blue advertising and recruiting for the same position following the redundancies.
A Virgin Blue spokeswoman has said the company completely rejects the allegations.
“Virgin Blue is an industry leader in supporting working mothers,” News.com.au quoted her as saying.
More than half of the airline’s workforce was female and 28 percent of the total workforce had flexible arrangements in the last 12 months.
“We are one of the only companies in Australia with 50 percent female representation in our executive team,” she added.
Both women will commence legal action in the Federal Court next week against their former employer, claiming their lives and careers were seriously disrupted by Virgin Blue’s behaviour. (ANI)
- Job shortage: part-timers on rise in Britain - May 16, 2012
- China to enhance maternity benefits for women - Nov 23, 2011
- Goldman sued by ex-VP over "mommy track" - Mar 25, 2010
- For women, a crash course in job skills - Jan 12, 2012
- Babies raised by working mums don't necessarily suffer cognitive setbacks - Jul 31, 2010
- Virgin Blue sacks 20 employees for viewing pornography - Jun 03, 2010
- Court questions Delhi University on Ph.D. admission (Lead) - Sep 14, 2011
- American Apparel CEO's lawyer says nude photos show ex-worker wasn't sex prisoner - Mar 26, 2011
- Australia creating 1,100 jobs every day - May 14, 2010
- Brazil wants firms to offer six months' maternity leave - Feb 17, 2012
- Scottish women in full-time work earn 12 percent less than men: Report - May 28, 2010
- Mothers prefer part-time jobs: Survey - Oct 23, 2010
- Australia lags behind developed countries in gender equality - Dec 03, 2010
- Wipro celebrates Women's Day with mentoring lunch - Mar 08, 2011
- Flexi HR policies make working attractive for women (March 8 is International Women's Day) - Mar 07, 2011
Tags: daily telegraph, executive team, female representation, flexible arrangements, four months, industry leader, maternity leave, news com au, nine years, part time work, public affairs department, redundancies, redundancy, sacks, specialist skills, suitable positions, time basis, virgin airlines, virgin blue, working mothers