Video gamers no better at multi-taskingJune 14th, 2012 - 4:03 pm ICT by IANS
Washington, June 14 (IANS) Video gamers are whiz kids while playing - performing complicated tasks at top speed to eliminate the enemy in order to gain points. But are they better at multi-tasking too? Not much.
A study by the Visual Cognition Lab at Duke University wanted to see whether gamers who have spent hours before a screen simultaneously watching the map, scanning doorways for bad guys and listening to the chatter of their fellow gamers could answer questions and drive at the same time. The finding: Not so much.
“It doesn’t matter how much you’ve trained your brain, we just aren’t set up to do this,” said Stephen Mitroff, associate professor of psychology and neuroscience and member of the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, who led the study.
The lab study measured the performance of 60 undergraduate students on three visual tasks, and then repeated each task while the subject answered Trivial Pursuit questions over a speakerphone.
“This was meant to mostly mimic a cell phone conversation,” Mitroff says without a trace of irony, according to a Duke statement.
The tasks were the video driving game “TrackMania”, a standard multiple-object tracking test that is something like a video version of a shell game, and a timed paper-and-pencil administration of hidden pictures puzzles from Highlights Magazine.
The gamers, all men who regularly played first-person shooter games, were significantly better at driving TrackMania with a steering wheel and pedals than the non-gamers, beating them by about 10 seconds on average. The non-gamers, 19 men and seven women, did just as well as the gamers on the multiple moving objects test and the Highlights puzzles.
It was difficult, acknowledges lead author Sarah Donahue, who recently completed her Ph.D. at Duke, to find non-gaming men and gaming women on a college campus.
Performance on the driving test was most harmed by talking on the phone, though it also declined on the other two tests. The gamers drove the racetrack about two seconds slower while multi-tasking, dropping from a mean of 101.7 seconds to 103 seconds. The non-gamers were 10 seconds slower, dropping from 112.9 seconds to 122.5.
In multiple-object tracking and the image search puzzle, both gamers and non-gamers saw similar declines in performance while multi-tasking.
So, for most people, Mitroff says, multitasking is probably a bad idea. But there is one small exception. A 2010 study by University of Utah psychologists Jason Watson and David Strayer found five people among 200 undergraduates who truly could multitask without a loss of performance, whom they dubbed “supertaskers”.
- How video games can enhance our visual attention - Nov 18, 2010
- Myth: Video games sharpen brain - Sep 16, 2011
- Study: Violent video games may not desensitize kids - Feb 24, 2011
- Video gamers are terrible drivers: Study - Feb 01, 2011
- Fast-paced video games boost ability to concentrate - Nov 19, 2010
- Airport security could miss contraband due to easy-to-spot prohibited items - Apr 21, 2010
- Playing video games won't make you fat - Jan 21, 2011
- Banned items can't be spotted easily - Apr 21, 2010
- Diet of emails, texts, tweets and status updates can drain your brain! - Apr 19, 2011
- Policemen good at multi-tasking less likely to shoot unarmed people - Mar 31, 2009
- Average age of adult video game player is 35: US study - Aug 18, 2009
- New study may help identify employees who enjoy multitasking - Sep 15, 2010
- Samsung launches premium notebook for Rs.1,02,990 in India - Aug 31, 2012
- Multi-tasking makes you feel good but hits performance - May 01, 2012
- Multi-tasking good for brain - Apr 14, 2012
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,