US warns of implications of UN veto on SyriaOctober 6th, 2011 - 11:06 am ICT by IANS
Washington, Oct 6 (IANS) Upset over the Russian and Chinese vetoes of a UN Security Council resolution threatening sanctions against Syria, the United States has said nations would have to take responsibility for implications of their vote on the ground there. India had abstained from the vote, saying it does not “place any responsbility on the (Syrian) opposition to abjure violence.”
However, state department spokesperson Victoria Nuland Wednesday declined to spell out if there would be any consequences for countries like India which abstained from voting on the resolution because it “does not accommodate our concerns about threat of sanctions.”
“I’m not going to speak to the abstentions,” she said in response to a question noting “We had nine votes, which was enough for passage. It was the vetoes that killed these resolutions.”
But, Nuland said: Countries have to take responsibility for the decision that they made yesterday and any implications it might have on the ground in Syria.”
As US ambassador to the UN Susan “Rice made clear yesterday after the vote, we obviously consider that the Security Council failed yesterday to address the urgent moral challenge and the growing threat to international peace and security caused by the Syrian regime’s brutality,” she said.
“We firmly believe that history will bear out which nations were right and which were on the wrong side in this vote yesterday.”
India’s Permanent Representative to the UN Hardeep Puri, announcing New Delhi’s abstention, noted the resolution does not condemn the violence perpetrated by the Syrian opposition.
“Nor does it place any responsibility on the opposition to abjure violence and engage with the Syrian authorities for redressal of their grievances through a peaceful political process,” he said, explaining India’s decision to keep away from the vote.
The resolution was rejected late Tuesday by a 9-2 vote, with four abstentions, including India.
(Arun Kumar can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org)
- India abstains from UNSC vote on Syria - Oct 05, 2011
- India votes for Syria resolution in UN General Assembly - Feb 17, 2012
- India backs move against Assad, rights body pats Delhi (Roundup) - Feb 05, 2012
- Russia, China veto UNSC draft resolution on Syria - Jul 19, 2012
- Russia, China kill India-backed resolution on Syria (Lead) - Feb 05, 2012
- US drones fly over Syria to monitor situation - Feb 20, 2012
- Concerned India backs democracy transition in Syria (Intro Roundup) - Feb 05, 2012
- Russia, China veto West's UN draft resolution on Syria (Lead) - Jul 20, 2012
- US blames Russia, China for Annan mission failure - Aug 03, 2012
- Russia, China veto UN resolution on Syria - Oct 05, 2011
- Syria vote: India calls lack of consensus regrettable - Aug 25, 2011
- EU to introduce new sanctions on Syria - Feb 06, 2012
- India, US to brainstorm on Syria, Iran - Aug 16, 2012
- India listens in on Iran conference on Syria - Aug 09, 2012
- India asks its citizens, mission staff to leave Syria - Jul 24, 2012
Tags: abstention, arun kumar, brutality, grievances, hardeep, international peace, moral challenge, responsbility, sanctions against syria, security council resolution, spokesperson, susan rice, syrian authorities, syrian opposition, syrian regime, un security council, un veto, vetoes, victoria nuland, wrong side