US national security team to focus on Al Qaeda in Pakistan: NYT
October 8th, 2009 - 1:50 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Oct.8 (ANI): President Obama’s national security team will reframe its war strategy by emphasizing the campaign against Al Qaeda in Pakistan while arguing that the Taliban in Afghanistan do not pose a direct threat to the United States.
The New York Times quoted officials as saying that Obama met with advisers for three hours to discuss Pakistan at the White House.
The shift in thinking, outlined by senior administration officials on Wednesday, suggests that the president has been presented with an approach that would not require all of the additional troops that his commanding general in the region has requested.
It remains unclear whether everyone in Obama’s war cabinet fully accepts this view.
While Vice President Joseph Biden Jr. has argued for months against increasing troops in Afghanistan because Pakistan was the greater priority, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates have both warned that the Taliban remain linked to Al Qaeda and would give their fighters havens again if the Taliban regained control of all or large parts of Afghanistan, making it a mistake to think of them as separate problems.
Obama’s commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, has argued that success demands a substantial expansion of the American presence, up to 40,000 more troops. Any decision that provides less will expose the president to criticism, especially from Republicans, that his policy is a prescription for failure.
The White House appears to be trying to prepare the ground to counter that by focusing attention on recent successes against Qaeda cells in Pakistan.
The approach described by administration officials on Wednesday amounted to an alternative to the analysis presented by General McChrystal.
The meeting on Wednesday was Obama’s third with his full national security team. Another is scheduled for Friday to talk about Afghanistan and then a fifth is planned, possibly for next week.
Obama’s spokesman Gibbs said the president was still several weeks away from a decision. (ANI)
- 'Angry' Obama recalls Afghan commander to Washington - Jun 23, 2010
- US commander McChrystal derides Vice-President Biden, Holbrooke and envoy - Jun 22, 2010
- Obama's war council focusing on Al Qaeda in Pakistan - Oct 08, 2009
- Obama fires top Afghanistan commander - Jun 24, 2010
- Obama in dilemma over sacking McChrystal, Afghan war effort - Jun 23, 2010
- Top US commander in Afghanistan resigns (Lead) - Jun 24, 2010
- Obama fires top Afghanistan commander McChrystal (Second Lead) - Jun 24, 2010
- General McChrystal to retire after Afghanistan firing - Jun 29, 2010
- Petraeus takes command, vows victory in Afghan war (Lead) - Jul 04, 2010
- Petraeus to take control of Afghan NATO forces Sunday - Jul 04, 2010
- ISI offering covert support to Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan: Expert - Sep 27, 2009
- Afghan Govt. backs Obama's decision to appoint Petraeus as new NATO boss - Jun 24, 2010
- General Stanley McChrystal's "Rolling Stone" Story Creates Waves - Jun 23, 2010
- Obama may favour sending 30,000 troops to Afghanistan - Nov 10, 2009
- Effective Pakistani government must to destroy Al Qaeda: Obama - Jun 25, 2010
Tags: administration officials, al qaeda, american presence, commanding general, defense secretary, general mcchrystal, havens, hillary rodham clinton, joseph biden, national security team, new york times, nyt, president joseph, secretary robert, senior administration, substantial expansion, taliban in afghanistan, troops in afghanistan, war cabinet, war strategy
