US mum on Nepal policy after Maoist victoryApril 22nd, 2008 - 1:27 pm ICT by admin
By Arun Kumar
Washington, April 22 (IANS) The US has declined to say if it plans to take the Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (CPN-Maoist) off its list of terrorist organisations, now that the Maoists are poised to lead the new government in the Himalayan kingdom. “Well, I’m not sure what, if any discussions, might be going on in that regard,” State Department spokesperson Tom Casey told reporters Monday when asked if the US was rethinking its Nepal policy following the Maoists’ election victory.
“As you know, there are legal criteria that are involved here,” he said, but also hinted at the possibility of a review to resolve the US dilemma.
Washington still regards the CPN-Maoist as a terrorist group although the group formally laid down weapons in 2006 and joined Nepal’s interim coalition government last year.
“I’m sure to the extent that any movement ends its association with terrorism and can do so in a way that would match those or meet those legal hurdles, that we’d certainly take a look at it,” Casey said. “But I can’t tell you at this point whether there is, in fact, an ongoing review related to Nepal.”
Asked if it suggested that the US was not severing any ties with the new government with Maoists in power even though it does not negotiate with terrorists, he parried: “Well, again, you know, an organisation being placed on the list of designated Foreign Terrorist Organisations has legal requirements that are placed on us.
“We have to honour those legal requirements and we’ll certainly do so in the case of Nepal,” he said again hinting at a review.
“To the broader question… certainly, to the extent you have an organisation that moves away from violence and terror, and participates in a political process and engages in those kinds of legitimate activities, you know, that would certainly, I think, give people an opportunity to at least look again at that situation and at that organisation.
“But at this point, you know, there’s no change in their status, and we’ll follow the law as appropriate,” Casey added.
After the Maoist victory, the State Department last week chose to merely congratulate “the people of Nepal on their historic Constituent Assembly election” with no reference to the outcome.
The bland first reaction made no reference at all to the Maoist party, leave alone giving any indication of a rethink of the country’s Nepal policy, which has for long considered preventing a Maoist takeover a key to achieving US regional goals.
“Strengthening Nepal to prevent a Maoist takeover is key to achieving US regional and bilateral goals, including preventing the spread of terror, enhancing regional stability, promoting democracy, and protecting US citizens in Nepal,” is how a recent US Congressional report put it.
“American foreign policy interests in Nepal seek to prevent the collapse of Nepal which should it become a failed state, could provide operational or support territory for terrorists,” it said, suggesting such a scenario could be destabilising to the security dynamics of the region.
- Nepal's Maoists welcome US' removal of terror tag - Sep 08, 2012
- Nepal Maoists taken off US terror list - Sep 07, 2012
- Nepal Maoists were never called a terrorist outfit: US - May 15, 2008
- India toughens anti-hijack policy, but remains vulnerable (12 years after IC-814 hijack) - Dec 23, 2011
- No change in Nepal Maoists' status for now: US - May 07, 2008
- US hints at political reconciliation with Maoists in Nepal - May 01, 2008
- Not training Nepali Maoists, says India; Rao to visit Kathmandu (Lead) - Dec 29, 2010
- U.S. gov't refuses to take Maoist party off terrorism lists despite election win - Aug 30, 2011
- India still main LeT target, but it has spread wings: US commander - Apr 13, 2011
- BJP describes Pak to be 'epicentre of global terrorism' - May 04, 2011
- 'Lack of political will making India terror target' - Dec 13, 2011
- US not ready to link Pakistan aid to action against LeT - Oct 28, 2011
- Nepal's apex court comes to Tibetan refugees' aid - Sep 23, 2011
- US clears Nepal for investment - Jun 29, 2011
- No clear Pakistani policy on terror: Daily - Sep 05, 2012
Tags: arun kumar, coalition government, communist party of nepal, communist party of nepal maoist, cpn maoist, dilemma, election victory, extent, himalayan kingdom, honour, legal criteria, legal hurdles, legitimate activities, maoist, maoists, spokesperson, state department, terrorist group, terrorist organisations, tom casey