US commanders want to take anti-terror war to Pakistan
April 20th, 2008 - 8:51 pm ICT by admin ( Leave a comment )
New York, April 20 (IANS) US commanders in Afghanistan have urged a widening of the war to include attacks on indigenous Pakistani militants in the bordering tribal areas, but their requests have been rebuffed for now, according to US officials. Bush administration officials fear that attacking Pakistani radicals may annoy Pakistan’s new government, which is negotiating with the militants, and destabilize an already fragile security situation, the New York Times reported Sunday.
US commanders would rather have Pakistani forces themselves attack the militants, but Pakistani operations in the tribal areas have recently been slowed to avoid upsetting the negotiations.
Islamabad has given the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) limited authority to kill Arab and other foreign militants in the tribal areas, using remotely piloted aircraft. The US operations against indigenous Pakistani militants are, however, greatly restricted.
The US intelligence officials believe that the threat emanating from the tribal areas is growing, and that Pakistani militant networks are allying with Al Qaeda in plotting attacks against the US and allied troops in Afghanistan, and in helping foreign operatives plan attacks on targets in the West.
The US military’s proposals include options for limited cross-border artillery strikes into Pakistan, missile attacks by Predator unmanned aircraft or raids by small teams of CIA paramilitary forces or Special Operations Forces, the Times said.
A list of potential targets was discussed with the US ambassador in Pakistan, Anne W. Patterson, the officials said.
Attacking Pakistani militants was a delicate issue because some militant leaders were believed to be still on the payroll of Pakistan’s intelligence apparatus.
Among the groups thought to be targets was one commanded by Sirajuddin Haqqani, son of the militant leader Jalaluddin Haqqani, and the network led by Baitullah Mehsud, believed to have been behind Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, the Times said.
- US aborted drone attack on Sirajuddin Haqqani in Pak over fear of civilian deaths - Feb 23, 2011
- US strike kills Afghan Taliban leader's son in Pakistan - Feb 19, 2010
- US gives up lobbying 'defiant' Pak for action against Haqqani network in Wazirastan - Aug 13, 2010
- US blocks property of Haqqani network commander - Nov 01, 2011
- Pak's attempted deal between US, Afghan Taliban fraught with risk over Haqqani's role - Sep 27, 2010
- US doubtful about winning war on Pakistan border - Dec 06, 2010
- US drone attack kills seven militants in Pakistan - Sep 05, 2010
- US still views silent Haqqani network as most dangerous of Taliban fighters - Dec 27, 2010
- Senior Haqqani leader captured in Afghanistan: NATO - Oct 01, 2011
- US wants Pak military action against Haqqani network in North Waziristan - Jul 12, 2010
- Pakistan considers India an existential threat: US - Feb 01, 2012
- Pak needs to do much more against Haqqani network for Afghan peace: Holbrooke - Jul 24, 2010
- Pak needs to do much more against Haqqani network for Afghan peace: Mullen - Jul 25, 2010
- ISI's tacit support to Haqqanis hampering CIA's anti-terrorism efforts in Pak: Report - Feb 18, 2011
- India readying for limited conflict with China: US (Second Lead) - Feb 01, 2012
Tags: allied troops, artillery, bush administration officials, central intelligence agency, cross border, delicate issue, foreign militants, fragile security, militant leader, missile attacks, new york times, operatives, paramilitary forces, predator unmanned aircraft, radicals, security situation, special operations forces, tribal areas, troops in afghanistan, us intelligence officials