US can’t depend on ‘game-playing’ Pak to get job done in Afghanistan: Ex-Spl Envoy
December 16th, 2010 - 2:07 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Dec 16(ANI): Former U.S. Special Envoy to Afghanistan, Peter Tomsen, has said that the Obama administration cannot depend on Pakistan to get its job done in Afghanistan, despite having given billions in civilian and military aid as incentives.
The issue of safe havens on the Pakistan side of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has dominated White House discussions about the war in recent weeks, and it is widely seen as an important factor in Obama’s high-stakes strategy.
Tomsen, Special Envoy to Afghanistan from 1989 to 1992, believes that Pakistan can dramatically limit the sanctuaries and cut its ties with the Taliban, but has never felt compelled to do so.
“This is a game Pakistan has played…for three decades: the military sees it as part of its strategy to promote Islamic extremism,” Politico quoted Tomsen, as saying.
“It’s been underway for decades. It continues today and we’ve tolerated it too long…..As long as the Pakistani military continues this policy, war will continue to tear at Afghanistan and the treasure we’ve put into trying to reconstruct Afghanistan will be wasted,” he added.
Tomsen further said that the U.S. should place strict conditions on aid to Pakistan based on actions, not statements from officials in Islamabad.
“If we take what the Pakistanis are saying at their word, we’re courting more disaster for ourselves in Afghanistan,” Tomsen said.
Tomsen’s comments come over the report on the progress of the Afghanistan war, which say that although there have been gains for the US and NATO in the war, the unwillingness of Pakistan to shut down militant sanctuaries in its lawless tribal region remains a serious obstacle.
It said that insurgents freely cross from Pakistan into Afghanistan to plant bombs and fight American troops and then return to Pakistan for rest and resupply.
The findings in the reports, called National Intelligence Estimates, represent the consensus view of the United States’ 16 intelligence agencies, and were provided last week to some members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees. (ANI)
- Afghan war can't be won without Pakistan in the hunt: NYT - Dec 15, 2010
- 'Afghan war being hampered due to Pak's unwillingness to hit terror havens on border' - Dec 15, 2010
- Ruggiero assures Pakistan of US' commitment to strategic ties - Jan 07, 2011
- Pak "not fast enough" in uprooting terror havens along Afghan border region:Obama - Dec 17, 2010
- Top Afghan official urges US to put sanctions on Pak for backing jihadis - Aug 27, 2010
- US to call Pak's bluff with more aid despite its double game on terror - Jan 08, 2011
- Will act on our own against terror, US warns Pakistan - Sep 30, 2011
- Confusion persists on Pakistan role in Osama killing (Second Lead) - May 03, 2011
- Obama reviews efforts to renew Pakistan ties: Daily - Feb 10, 2012
- Killing of Osama bin Laden has rehabilitated reputation of US Government, officials - May 04, 2011
- Clinton arrives in Pakistan - Jul 18, 2010
- US efforts fail to convince Pakistan's top general to target safe Taliban havens - Jan 01, 2011
- Obama slams Pakistan's terror ties; says be peaceful with India - Oct 07, 2011
- You can't keep snakes in backyard, Clinton tells Pakistan - Oct 21, 2011
- US diverting drones from Afghanistan to bolster attacks on Pak-based militant havens - Oct 02, 2010
Tags: afghanistan pakistan, afghanistan war, american troops, consens, insurgents, islamabad, military aid, national intelligence estimates, obstacle, pakistan border, pakistan side, pakistani military, pakistanis, peter tomsen, plant bombs, safe havens, sanctuaries, spl, strict conditions, three decades