US apex court sides with Obama on immigration lawJune 25th, 2012 - 11:57 pm ICT by IANS
Washington, June 25 (IANS) Handing US President Barack Obama a partial victory in an election year, the Supreme Court Monday largely sided with his administration to strike down key parts of a controversial Arizona law on immigration.
But it was a less than complete win as the court’s 5-3 ruling also upheld the most controversial provision of the Republican-ruled state’s law involving police checks on people’s immigration status while enforcing other laws if “reasonable suspicion” exists that the person is in the US illegally.
“The national government has significant power to regulate immigration,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion, ruling the federal government had the power to block the Arizona law.
“Arizona may have understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration while that process continues, but the state may not pursue policies that undermined federal law,” he added.
In its ruling, the apex court also made clear the immigration status provision could still face future constitutional challenges depending on how the state enforces it.
The Obama administration had challenged four major provisions of the Arizona law that never were enforced, pending the legal ruling, arguing immigration matters were strictly a federal function.
Writing for the minority, Justice Antonin Scalia argued the court’s ruling encroached on Arizona’s sovereign powers.
“If securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state,” he wrote.
Provisions struck down included authorising police to arrest immigrants without warrant, making it a state crime for “unauthorized immigrants” to fail to carry identification papers and soliciting work or even indicating their willingness to do so with a “gesture or nod”.
Arizona had passed the tough immigration law because of what it said was the federal government’s inability to stop the flow of illegal immigrants crossing from Mexico.
Similar laws passed by several other states are under challenge in lower courts in Georgia, Alabama, Utah, Indiana and South Carolina. Arizona’s appeal is the first to reach the Supreme Court.
(Arun Kumar can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org)
- South Asians fear racial profiling over US court ruling - Jun 26, 2012
- South Asians seek rejection of tough US immigration law - Apr 26, 2012
- US challenges tough Arizona immigration law (Lead) - Jul 07, 2010
- Several US states to propose bills for fighting illegal immigration - Jan 01, 2011
- U.S. District Judge blocks controversial parts of new Arizona immigration law - Jul 29, 2010
- US Supreme Court overturns California video game law - Jun 28, 2011
- Fate of Obama's healthcare law hangs in balance - Mar 29, 2012
- US sues Arizona over controversial immigration law - Jul 07, 2010
- US healthcare verdict gives Obama huge win - Jun 29, 2012
- Federal Judge Susan Bolten Blocks Provisions of Arizona Immigration Law - Jul 29, 2010
- Mexico Files Suit Against Arizona Over Immigration Law - Jun 23, 2010
- US court tosses out key parts of Obama's healthcare reform - Aug 13, 2011
- Obama slams controversial Arizona immigration bill over 'racial profiling' fears - Apr 24, 2010
- Janet Napolitano: the Justice Department to review Arizona immigration law - Apr 28, 2010
- Arizona Immigration Law Challenged By Federal Goverment - Jul 07, 2010
Tags: anthony kennedy, antonin scalia, apex court, arizona law, barack obama, constitutional challenges, controversial provision, illegal immigration, immigration law, immigration matters, immigration status, justice anthony kennedy, justice antonin scalia, majority opinion, partial victory, police checks, reasonable suspicion, sovereign powers, sovereign state, state crime