UK would not have invaded Iraq ‘if we knew what we know now’: Miliband
April 20th, 2010 - 1:21 pm ICT by ANI
London, Apr 20(ANI): British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has said that the UK would not have invaded Iraq in 2003, if it had been clear that the then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
When asked if he would still have supported the invasion of Iraq if he had known then what was known now, Miliband said: “Obviously there would have been no such decision”.”If we had known then what we know now, if we’d have known that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, there would have been no UN resolutions and no vote in the House of Commons,” The Scotsman quoted Miliband, as saying.
His position appears to clash with comments made by then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair and then -Chancellor Gordon Brown, who have insisted that removing Saddam would “still have been the right decision”.
In January, Blair told the Iraq Inquiry he felt “responsibility, but not regret” for removing Saddam.
“I believe he threatened not just the region, but the world. And in the circumstances that we faced then, but I think even if you look back now, it was better to deal with this threat, to remove him from office,” Blair said.
Brown giving evidence to the same inquiry last month, said it had been the “right decision” to overthrow Saddam, who he said had been a “serial violator” of international law.
“These were difficult decisions, these were decisions that required judgment, these were decisions that required strong leadership, these were decisions that were debated and divided a lot of opinion in the country,” Brown had said.
“I believe they were the right decisions for the right reasons, but I also believe it is our duty to learn the lessons from what has happened,” he added. (ANI)
- Iraq invasion was right even if Saddam Hussein didn't possess WMD: Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- UK inquiry committee to hear Blair give Iraq War evidence, but in secret - Dec 13, 2009
- US was high on military before Iraq invasion: Hans Blix - Jul 28, 2010
- Britain went to war with Iraq on "assumption" of WMDs: Jonathan Powell - Jan 19, 2010
- Blair was warned by 27 lawyers 'Iraq invasion without UN backing was illegal' - Jan 27, 2010
- I would have invaded Iraq, WMDs or not: Tony Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- Iraq invasion would not have happened if Bush was not misled on WMD: Aide - Mar 05, 2010
- Nelson Mandela was dismayed when "small man" Bush invaded Iraq - Nov 12, 2010
- Blair could have pulled troops back on brink of 2003 invasion of Iraq: Straw - Feb 03, 2011
- Blair knew 10 days in advance before Iraq war that Saddam did not have WMD - Nov 26, 2009
- Blair's Govt. 'intentionally and substantially' exaggerated WMD threat - Jul 13, 2010
- Bush justifies Iraq invasion as removal of threat even though no WMD's were found - Nov 13, 2010
- I don't regret Iraq war, says Condoleezza Rice - Jan 21, 2011
- 9/11 led to war decision, Blair tells Iraq probe - Jan 29, 2010
- Blair neglected intelligence report warning that Saddam didn't have WMD - Dec 09, 2009
Tags: british prime minister, british prime minister tony blair, chancellor gordon brown, david miliband, difficult decisions, gordon brown, house of commons, invasion of iraq, iraqi president, minister tony blair, president saddam, prime minister tony blair, right decision, saddam hussein, scotsman, secretary david, tony blair, violator, weapons of mass destruction, wmd