UK Govt. drug advisors ecstasy-horse riding comparison fuels furoreFebruary 7th, 2009 - 5:57 pm ICT by ANI
London, Feb 7 (ANI): A Brit government official has created a furore by suggesting that addiction to ecstasy is not more dangerous than riding a horse.
Government drug advisor Prof David Nutt, wrote in an academic journal that taking ecstasy was no worse than the risks of “equasy”, a term he used to describe people’’s addiction to horse-riding.
However, campaigners have raised voices against his comments, and demanded his resignation as the chairman of the Home Office’’s Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which is expected to announce next week that ecstasy should be downgraded to a Class B drug.
The campaigners claim that Nutts comment was part of his personal crusade” to decriminalise the drug.
Nutt said that he wanted to weigh the risks of horse-riding with the drug to open a debate about drug abuse and risk taking.
“The point was to get people to understand that drug harm can be equal to harms in other parts of life. There is not much difference between horse riding and ecstasy, the Telegraph quoted Prof Nutt as saying.
In the article, titled Equasy: An overlooked addiction with implications for the current debate on drug harms, Nutt wrote that “equasy”, short for “Equine Addiction Syndrome”, had caused 10 deaths and more than 100 road traffic accidents a year.
“Dependence, as defined by the need to continue to use, has been accepted by the courts in divorce settlements. Based on these harms, it seems likely that the ACMD would recommend control under the MDAct perhaps as a class A drug given it appears more harmful than ecstasy,” he wrote.
He also said that the risks of horse riding showed that society “does not adequately balance the relative risks of drugs against their harms”.
He said: “Making riding illegal would completely prevent all these harms and would be, in practice, very easy to do.
“This attitude raises the critical question of why society tolerates indeed encourages certain forms of potentially harmful behaviour but not others, such as drug use.”
There were plenty of other “risky activities such as base jumping, climbing, bungee jumping, hang-gliding, motorcycling” which were worse than which “many illicit drugs”.
Nutt, who is an academic at Bristol University and Imperial College, London, wrote the article in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. (ANI)
- LSD and cannabis less harmful than alcohol, says UK govt's drug expert - Oct 29, 2009
- Booze 'much more harmful than crack or heroin' - Nov 01, 2010
- Alcohol 'more dangerous than crack cocaine': Study - Nov 02, 2010
- Study: Alcohol is more harmful than heroin - Nov 01, 2010
- Alcohol more damaging than heroin, cocaine? - Nov 01, 2010
- Alcohol 'more dangerous than crack cocaine' study provokes anger - Nov 02, 2010
- Ecstasy use does not decrease mental ability: Study - Feb 16, 2011
- Recreational Ecstasy use linked to loss of brain efficiency - May 04, 2011
- New Study: Alcohol More Dangerous Than Heroin, Crack - Nov 02, 2010
- Ecstasy pills more harmful than earlier thought - Jul 26, 2012
- Blind daredevil to take on English Channel swim - May 01, 2012
- Ban on party drug miaow miaow 'may have done harm rather than good' - Feb 13, 2011
- 1 in 5 horses overweight or obese: Study - Jan 19, 2011
- Long-term ecstasy users 'risk structural brain damage' - Apr 07, 2011
- Ecstasy linked to more than 200 deaths - Apr 25, 2011
Tags: academic journal, acmd, advisory council on the misuse of drugs, campaigners, critical question, david nutt, divorce settlements, drug abuse, ecstasy, equine, government drug, government official, london feb, misuse of drugs, personal crusade, prof david, relative risks, riding a horse, road traffic accidents, uk govt