Thomas Jefferson was no closet royalist
July 4th, 2010 - 3:23 pm ICT by ANIWashington, July 4 (ANI): Thomas Jefferson, the principal author of the American Delcaration of Independence and one of founding fathers of the US, was by no means a closet royalist, a new study has confirmed.Using high-resolution spectral imaging, The Library of Congress revealed that Jefferson, on the third page of a “rough draught,” wiped the word “subjects” off with his hand and carefully wrote the word “citizens” on top.
Declaration drafts have numerous strike-throughs and corrections, but the “subjects” mistake is the only one completely obliterated by a Founder.
Jefferson’s original line read: “[The British government] has incited treasonable insurrections in our fellow-subjects, with the allurements of forfeiture & confiscation of our property.”
For Jefferson, who advocated individual liberty even as he maintained more than 200 slaves at his Virginia estate, the slip also hints at “The Sage of Monticello” struggling to resolve the revolutionary social and cultural changes in the late 18th century and shows, in the blotting of fresh ink, the resolve needed to break from European patriarchal politics.
“It actually may represent a dawning in the mind of Jefferson, mid-sentence, that with this document the whole relationship between individuals and government is turned on its head from what had been accepted for thousands of years before. For an historian this is like an astronomer seeing a snapshot of the Big Bang,” The Christian Science Monitor quoted commenter “An American Expatriate”, as writing on the conservative Free Republic website.
The philosophical difference between “subjects” and “citizens” in fact defined the Declaration of Independence, making the correction quite intriguing to historians.
Library of Congress preservation director Dianne van der Reyden said: “It’s almost like we can see him write ’subjects’ and then quickly decide that’s not what he wanted to say at all, that he didn’t even want a record of it. Really, it sends chills down the spine.”
Jefferson could have made a Freudian slip, an unintended revelation of one’s actual feelings.
But Jefferson was also simply stating a fact: at the time of writing, Jefferson and his fellow not-yet-Americans were, in fact, still subjects of King George.
Most likely, however, Jefferson lifted the word “subjects” from the First Virginia Constitution, which also refers to “our fellow subjects.” (ANI)
- A Study Divulges That Thomas Jefferson Was Not A Clandestine Royalist - Jul 04, 2010
- Blurred Out Word Of Thomas Jefferson's Declaration Of Independence Deciphered - Jul 04, 2010
- Natalie Barr's on-air gaffe about 'virgin' sized Barbie doll - Apr 19, 2011
- History Channel Features The Library Of Congress On "Modern Marvels" - Jun 11, 2010
- Unreturned library book found after 123 years - Dec 31, 2011
- 18th century library reopens in Aurangabad after 70 years - Dec 23, 2009
- Brit MP publicly broadcasts swear word 'c' - Dec 07, 2010
- Aneesh Chopra, Obama's Indian American IT head, quits - Jan 28, 2012
- Palin attacks Obama's gaffes in Thanksgiving message - Nov 26, 2010
- Americanisms aren't taking over the British language: Study - Mar 14, 2011
- Pak court extends detention of US citizen held on 'illegal stay' charges - Mar 07, 2011
- Hanif Kureishi awarded Pinter literary prize - Sep 18, 2010
- Leave literature alone, don't adapt it, says Saeed Mirza - Mar 15, 2012
- Arsworm, Bumfodder, Farting-crackers - 17th century slang from London - Aug 12, 2010
- Chris Brown talks his way out of parking ticket despite yelling homophobic slur - Jun 24, 2011
Tags: astronomer, british government, christian science monitor, confiscation, declaration of independence, delcaration of independence, expatriate, fellow subjects, forfeiture, founding fathers, free republic, individual liberty, insurrections, library of congress, mid sentence, philosophical difference, principal author, rough draught, spectral imaging, virginia estate
