Pak SC seeks way out in case of martial lawNovember 14th, 2007 - 2:43 am ICT by admin
The 11-member Supreme Court bench resumed the hearing of the petitions challenging the acceptance of Musharraf’s nomination papers after a three-day break.
When Aitzaz asked the court to pronounce its verdict according to the Constitution and aspirations of the people, Justice Javed Iqbal, head of the bench, asked him if he wanted a decision based on the aspirations of the people or a decision based on constitutional provisions.
“What’s the guarantee that whatever decision the court would take will be implemented?” he asked.
Aitzaz said the court had declared that the doctrine of necessity was history, adding that the Constitution opposed the running of an army officer for elections and he would prove it through arguments.
Justice Ramday asked Aitzaz if the court could rule out imposition of martial law. “It will be difficult for me to say that martial law is buried because a full court had ruled in 1988 that martial law had been buried forever, but this was not the case,” he said.
Aitzaz said that the Constitution allowed Musharraf to hold two offices till November 16, but he couldn’t contest elections for the office of President because there was no provision in the 17th Amendment for an Army Chief to participate in the election.
He said that if the court decided against Musharraf, there was a complete process in the Constitution for the transition of power and the Senate chairman should take over as acting President on November 15 and hold the presidential election for the next term.
Aitzaz said there was no room for imposition of martial law and the court should uphold the Constitution.
He said the nation was in a state of civil war and it’s time the court saved the nation by giving a verdict according to the Constitution.
Aitzaz said that Articles 243, 244 and 245 of the Constitution clearly said that no army man could take part in politics.
He said that the Army Act also barred army officers from participating in politics.
He said that Musharraf was not qualified to contest the presidential election the day he had filed his nomination papers, therefore, he could not be declared a lawful candidate for the office, the Daily Times reported. (ANI)
- Pak judiciary not at war with executive: Justice Ramday - Oct 19, 2010
- Hajj corruption scandal: Pak SC cracks down on investigating agency - Jan 12, 2011
- Gilani contempt verdict to be announced April 26 - Apr 24, 2012
- PM Gilani has committed contempt, rules court (Third Lead) - Feb 03, 2012
- SC declines to stay Andhra court order against sub-quota (Third Lead) - Jun 13, 2012
- Army to give permanent commission to women in two months (Lead) - Aug 02, 2010
- Plea against Tendulkar's Rajya Sabha nomination dismissed (Lead) - May 14, 2012
- Chaos in Colombo court after ex-army chief gets new jail term - Nov 19, 2011
- Show rule that makes women ineligible for army: Apex court (Lead) - Jul 26, 2010
- Gilani stands disqualified as PM, rules Supreme Court (Second Lead) - Jun 19, 2012
- Gangster allowed to file poll papers from jail - Jan 18, 2012
- Bangladesh wants ex-president prosecuted, punished - Aug 25, 2010
- Lahore High Court postpones hearing of petition against Musharraf - Nov 02, 2010
- Rehman Malik backs ruling PPP to complete five-year term - Nov 03, 2010
- Government gets court notice on deaths in army's Kashmir action (Lead) - Jan 23, 2012
Tags: 17th amendment, acting president, army, aspirations, constitution, constitutional provisions, contest elections, day break, imposition, javed iqbal, justice, martial law, musharraf, nomination papers, pak sc, senate chairman, supreme court bench, verdict