Outrage over UK decision to implement ‘Sus’ laws allowing police to target minorities
October 16th, 2010 - 2:21 pm ICT by ANILondon, Oct 16 (ANI): According to a new proposal, British police would now be allowed to implement the ‘Sus law,’ which was scrapped in the 1980s after the alleged targeting of black people by police led to race riots in London, Birmingham and Liverpool.
The Sus law was the informal name for ‘a stop and search law’ in Britain that permitted a police officer to act on suspicion, or ’sus’, alone.
According to the Daily Mail, the news threatened to ignite a huge row between the Government and civil liberties groups last night and they feared that the law would allow officers to stop and search people on the basis of their ‘ethnic background’, like it did in the past.
The original law said that police should target suspects only on the basis of ‘reasonable suspicion’ that they are involved in or plotting a crime and not any specific group like Muslims based on an apparent threat from Islamic extremists, the paper said.
However, the draft Home Office police guidance have reportedly set down new rules that would allow ‘race to be a basis for stop and search without suspicion’.
The civil liberties group claims the proposal goes against the recommendations in Sir William Macpherson’s Inquiry into the death of Stephen Lawrence, and would also breach Labour’s Equality Act 2010.
The Act, framed by Labour Deputy Leader Harriet Harman, prohibits race discrimination by public bodies.
Isabella Sankey, director of policy for Liberty, said: “Stopping and searching individuals without suspicion is divisive enough without telling police they can directly discriminate on the grounds of race.”
“Significant progress has been made since the Lawrence Inquiry but the Home Office’s planned changes will set the clock back and jeopardise race relations in the UK,” she added.
The controversy centres on Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. This allows for a police officer to stop and search without suspicion in a designated area for a 24-hour period, the paper reports.
Although currently, it does not give any ground for targeting a person on the basis of race, the Home Office’s suggested amendments to the guidance says that while officers ‘must take particular care’ not to discriminate, there ‘may be circumstances where it is appropriate for officers to take account of an individual’s ethnic origin in selecting persons and vehicles to be stopped’. (ANI)
- Home Office stop, search plans are 'discriminatory and racist', warns UK watchdog - Nov 16, 2010
- Racial profiling undermining moral authority of democracy in UK: Jesse Jackson - Oct 18, 2010
- British government curtails 'stop-and-search' powers - Jul 09, 2010
- UK police demands new powers to stop and search terror suspects - Dec 30, 2010
- UN experts say Arizona immigration law may not be compatible with international human rights - May 12, 2010
- UK mayor's report favors minority recruits joining Met at a higher rank - Jul 08, 2010
- Death of office jokes with Brit law that lets 'anyone sue for anything' - Oct 02, 2010
- 'Big Brother' laws to be reviewed in Britain - Jul 14, 2010
- UK's `racist' Met Police accused of `excessive' stops of ethnic minorities - Mar 11, 2010
- London police asked to have more ethnic officers - Jul 08, 2010
- Britain to introduce legislation to monitor internet use - Apr 02, 2012
- Five employees of The Sun held in Britain - Feb 11, 2012
- Oz officer fined for driving 210 km/h in 60km/h zone attending distress call - Aug 02, 2010
- UK police force losing fight against racism, says report - Sep 24, 2009
- Manchester Airport terminal reopens after alert over suspicious device - Sep 21, 2011
Tags: british police, civil liberties group, civil liberties groups, clock back, criminal justice and public order act 1994, daily mail, deputy leader, equality act, harriet harman, islamic extremists, jeopardise, lawrence inquiry, race discrimination, race riots, reasonable suspicion, sankey, search law, sir william macpherson, specific group, uk decision