Obama in dilemma over reconciliation with Taliban
January 27th, 2010 - 2:41 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )
Washington, Jan. 27 (ANI): After committing 30,000 additional troops into Afghanistan, the Obama administration is facing a great dilemma over whether or not to extend an olive branch to Taliban fighters who have sheltered Osama bin Laden for so long.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai had said he wanted to reach out to the leaders of the Taliban, and the proposal, still in its early stages, could shape the next phase of America’s engagement in Afghanistan, the New York Times reports.
On Thursday, donor countries, led by the United States, Britain and Japan, are likely to commit 100 million dollars a fund for reintegrating the low-end soldiers of the Afghan Taliban.
But the US is not very optimistic about dealing with the Taliban’s high command, particularly its leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, and other “hard core” Taliban.”
“It’s our view that until the Taliban leadership sees a change in the momentum and begins to see that they are not going to win, the likelihood of significant reconciliation at senior levels is not terribly great,” Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said last week in India.
The pros and cons of dealing with the Taliban will be discussed at the conference in London this week, where Karzai is scheduled to present his plan for lower-level reintegration.
Despite scepticism over how to deal with Mullah Omar, the administration’s openness to reconciling with other Taliban leaders has grown since last year because of its recognition that the war is not going to be won purely on the battlefield.
“Today, people agree that part of the solution for Afghanistan is going to include an accommodation with the Taliban, even above low- and middle-level fighters,” said an administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
But experts fear that the reconciliation process could embolden the Taliban.
“The more there is talk of negotiation, the more the Taliban view it as a sign of weakness. How do you make sure the reconciliation process does not embolden the Taliban to go on the march?” said Vanda Felbab-Brown, an expert on Afghanistan at the Brookings Institution.
So as of now, the Obama administration id likely to focus on lower-level street fighters, US military officials said. (ANI)
- Petraeus holds out prospect of US reconciliation with Taliban - Aug 16, 2010
- Worried US 'skeptical' over Pak's Afghan reconciliation efforts - Jun 28, 2010
- 'US sees bin-Laden's killing a chance to end Afghan war' - May 04, 2011
- US would back Afghanistan's Taliban reintegration policy: Holbrooke - Jan 28, 2010
- NATO facilitating Afghan-Taliban talks in Kabul: Official - Oct 14, 2010
- Pak captured Mulla Baradar to stop him from reconciling with Afghan govt: Wali Karzai - Nov 30, 2010
- Taliban ready for peace talks in Afghanistan - Jan 29, 2011
- Karzai confirms 'unofficial talks' with Taliban - Oct 11, 2010
- Taliban threatens to kill anyone taking up Afghan Govt's peace talks offer - Nov 07, 2010
- Kayani rubbishes reports about organising 'secret' Karzai-Haqqani meeting - Jul 02, 2010
- Karzai to brief India on new Taliban strategy - Oct 03, 2011
- Taliban denies Mullah Omar is dead (Night Lead) - May 23, 2011
- Pak Army's proposal to mediate between US, Mullah Omar rejected: WikiLeaks - Dec 04, 2010
- US would accept 'reformed' Taliban in Afghanistan if 'red lines' respected: Holbrooke - Jun 07, 2010
- Mulla Umar refused Karzai's 35,000-govt jobs offer for Taliban fighters - Nov 16, 2010
Tags: administration official, afghan taliban, anonymity, defense secretary, donor countries, hamid karzai, mullah muhammad omar, mullah omar, new york times, obama, olive branch, openness, pros and cons, reconciliation, reintegration, scepticism, secretary robert, taliban, taliban leadership, york times reports