Obama administration walking the line on deal with Iran
October 3rd, 2009 - 5:19 pm ICT by ANI
-
Washington, Oct. 3 (ANI): During this week’s meeting between US and Iranian negotiators in Geneva, Tehran has agreed to send most of its openly declared enriched uranium outside Iran to be turned into fuel, but the Obama administration is still sceptical about its victory.
President Barack Obama’s strategy of ‘direct engagement, without preconditions, with Iran’ seemed to have worked, but considering Iran’s backtracking history, Washington is still wondering whether the Islamic country is serious this time?
Iranians have often been accused of making promises and encouraging more meetings, while waiting for political currents to change or the closed ranks among the Western allies to break.
“Taking the step of transferring its low-enriched uranium to a third country would be a step towards building confidence that Iran’s program is in fact peaceful.
“We’re not interested in talking for the sake of talking. If Iran does not take steps in the near future to live up to its obligations, then the United States will not continue to negotiate indefinitely, and we are prepared to move towards increased pressure,” the New York Times quoted a cautious Obama, as saying.
According to the paper, the lukewarm announcements were exact opposite of what a White House usually does after major international talks. Instead of painting tepid concessions as major breakthroughs and going on and on about “warm substantive” meetings, officials were treating a major breakthrough as if it were a suspicious package.
“This is actually quite important if it takes place. If you establish an arrangement whereby Iran’s fuel is exported abroad, then that relieves some degree of your proliferation concern. You don’t want to go out and celebrate an achievement and then watch the Iranians backtrack. You have to actually get that L.E.U. on a plane, said Ray Takeyh, a former Iran adviser to the Obama administration.
Further deteriorating Washington’s concern were Iranian officials, who did not sound as if they had promised anything.
“No, no! The idea of sending Iran’s enriched uranium out of the county had “not been discussed yet,” Mehdi Saffare, Iran’s ambassador to Britain said. (ANI)
Related Stories
- Israel welcomes result of US-Iran talks - Oct 04, 2009
- Iran agrees to nuclear inspections, more talks with US and allies (Lead) - Oct 02, 2009
- World powers urge Iran to reconsider nuclear deal - Nov 20, 2009
- Iran refuses to send uranium stockpile out of country - Oct 30, 2009
- Nuclear talks held up by Iran's rejection of France - Oct 20, 2009
- Iran to increase uranium enrichment if Vienna talks fail - Oct 19, 2009
- Uranium exchange 'test' for cooperation with West: Ahmadinejad - Oct 12, 2009
- Iran rejects compromise deal, will not send uranium abroad - Nov 18, 2009
- UN nuclear inspectors arrive in Iran - Oct 25, 2009
- Iran seeks changes to international uranium deal - Oct 30, 2009
- World
- adviser
- backtrack
- backtracking
- barack obama
- building confidence
- concessions
- geneva
- iranians
- islamic country
- negotiators
- new york times
- political currents
- preconditions
- proliferation concern
- ray takeyh
- suspicious package
- tehran
- uranium
- walking the line
- western allies
Posted in World, |