Musharraf fears negative Supreme Court rulingNovember 14th, 2007 - 2:07 am ICT by admin
Attorney General Justice (retired) Malik Qayyum also furthered such fears by saying that if the President does not get a green signal from the Supreme Court, the presidential election would be held afresh.
The government was happy on October 5 when the 10-Judge Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Javed Iqbal in a short order, neither stayed the presidential election nor barred Musharraf from contesting, but only directed the Election Commission not to notify the result of the elections till the disposal of the petitions by the apex court.
Thrilled by the short order certain government functionaries distributed sweets the same day. On October 6, after the unofficial victory of Musharraf, top government functionaries and ruling coalition bigwigs publicly expressed jubilation the win.
However, the withholding of the formal announcement of this victory by the Supreme Court later started haunting the minds of the rulers.
On October 17th, a reconstituted larger bench of the SC comprising 11 judges would again start hearing the case and is expected to adjudicate upon the petition within this month.
In any case, it would come out with its verdict before November 15, the cut-off date for Musharraf to leave his military office.
The Supreme Court has been reconstituting and enlarging the bench, hearing petitions against Musharraf’s candidature, because of one reason or the other.
On the request of presidential candidate Justice (retired) Wajihuddin Ahmed’s lawyers for a full court, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had previously enlarged the bench to 10 judges to take up their petition against Musharraf’s candidacy, declared valid by the Chief Election Commissioner.
Interestingly the Jamaat-e-Islami, which on Wednesday filed a review petition in the apex court against the Supreme Court’s September 28 decision that dismissed constitutional petitions challenging President’s dual office on technical grounds, has prayed for the formation of the full court.
If its review petition is clubbed with the petitions of Justice (retired) Wajihuddin and others then the question of reconstituting the bench would reoccur again, The News reported. (ANI)
- Lahore High Court postpones hearing of petition against Musharraf - Nov 02, 2010
- Government asked to finalise policy on ex-judges' advice - Feb 29, 2012
- Pakistani PM gets two weeks to write to Swiss powers - Jul 25, 2012
- New bench of apex court to hear 2G review plea - Mar 03, 2012
- Justice Bedi to monitor Gujarat 'encounters' probe (Lead) - Mar 02, 2012
- Gilani stands disqualified as PM, rules Supreme Court (Second Lead) - Jun 19, 2012
- 2G: Apex court allows review plea withdrawal (Second Lead) - May 10, 2012
- Details sought of medical reimbursements to cabinet ministers, bureaucrats - Mar 29, 2012
- Supreme Court dismisses plea by retired judge - Nov 04, 2011
- Gujarat to move apex court on Lokayukta Thursday (Lead) - Jan 18, 2012
- 2G: Apex court examines review petitions - Apr 03, 2012
- Sindh High Court reserves verdict on Musharraf's high treason trial - Aug 18, 2010
- Review sought of ruling on public servant's prosecution (Lead) - Mar 02, 2012
- 2G case: Apex court allows review petition withdrawal - May 10, 2012
- Auction of resources rational option, apex court told (Second Lead) - Jun 04, 2012
Tags: adjudicate, apex court, benazir bhutto, bigwigs, chief election commissioner, fears, javed iqbal, justice, military office, musharraf, petition, petitions, presidential election, supreme court bench, victory