Miracle births stoke debates over fertility treatmentFebruary 8th, 2009 - 11:53 am ICT by IANS
Los Angeles, Feb 8 (DPA) A single mother of six has octuplets in California. A 60-year-old Canadian gives birth to twins after going to India to have two embryos from another woman implanted in her womb.
While fertility treatments has been a life-changing blessing for millions of people, the “miracle births” of recent weeks are fuelling long-standing debates about the ethical and practical challenges it poses.
The California Medical Board said it had launched an investigation into how Nadya Suleman, 33, managed to be implanted with at least six embryos, because such high-order multiple pregnancies pose great dangers to both the mother and children.
The board will investigate whether there were any violations of medical standards by the so far unnamed fertility doctor who helped Suleman become pregnant with the octuplets born last month. Fertility experts have widely criticised the implantation on grounds of medical ethics, because it poses unnecessary dangers to the mother and babies.
Suleman’s miracle delivery came just two days before another extreme case of the boundaries of fertility ethics.
Ranjit Hayer gave birth to twins after four decades of trying to conceive with her husband. After she was refused treatment last year in Canada because of her age, she flew to India for donor eggs.
Canada’s health care system stops fertility treatments at age 50, citing the increased health risks for mothers in that age, including death.
“Medically, it’s very risky for both the mother and the babies,” fertility expert Cal Greene told Toronto’s Globe and Mail. “We don’t consider it in the best interests of the child.”
Beyond medical ethics, both cases have exposed sharp social issues, too.
A chorus of critics have asked whether it is right to let one woman have 14 children, all by test-tube conception. Does it matter that she is unmarried, lives with her parents on disability income and has been described by her own mother as psychologically unstable?
In Hayer’s case, is it right to pay Indian women a relative pittance for their eggs, and should the public-health system have to pay for the added costs of treating a 60-year-old mother?
In the initial excerpts of her first interview aired last Friday. Suleman did little to put those questions to rest.
“I just longed for certain connections and attachments with another person that I really lacked, I believe, growing up,” she said.
Asked what she felt she lacked, she replied: “Feeling of self and identity. I didn’t feel as though, when I was a child, I had much control of my environment. I felt powerless, and that gave me a sense of predictability. Reflecting back on my childhood, I know it wasn’t functional. It was pretty, pretty dysfunctional, and whose isn’t?”
Suleman claimed that she was being unfairly judged simply because she was a single mother.
“I feel I’m under the microscope because I chose this unconventional life,” said Suleman, who claimed she did what couples struggling to have children do all the time.
She acknowledged taking risks by having six embryos implanted - two of which split into identical twins, she claims.
“I wanted them all transferred. Those are my children,” she said. “And that’s what was available, and I used them. I took a risk. It’s a gamble. It always is.”
Tags: california medical board, disability income, donor eggs, embryos, extreme case, fertility doctor, fertility ethics, fertility expert, fertility experts, fertility treatment, fertility treatments, going to india, health care system, health risks, medical ethics, medical standards, nadya, single mother, suleman, test tube