Legal analysts question legality of targeting US lawyers in torture inquiry
April 22nd, 2009 - 5:40 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Apr 22 (ANI): With President Barack Obama reopening the possibility of investigating and even prosecuting Bush Administration lawyers on the so-called “torture memos”, the legal analysts have questioned question the US Justice Department move.
These “torture memos” cleared the way for the CIA to use harsh interrogation methods when questioning suspected terrorists.
Obama’s move doesn’t mean those attorneys will end up facing prison sentences any time soon, FOX News reported.
Some legal analysts doubt the Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder have the stomach for taking on their predecessors. And others question whether the Justice Department would pursue a case that amounts to prosecuting a legal opinion.
“My prediction is you’ll never see prosecutions,” said Doug Burns, a former federal prosecutor.
He said Obama was merely back-pedalling on Tuesday to blunt the political backlash he was facing from the left.
Though the president has said that CIA agents will not be charged for following legal guidelines for interrogations, some Democrats have pushed him to support prosecution of the lawyers who drafted the legal ground for such interrogations. Obama said Tuesday that he will defer to Holder on those potential charges.
“It would really be a very, very difficult case to make,” said Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer and former official in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy.
Not impossible, though. Fein said the prosecutor in the case would have to prove that the Bush attorneys essentially fabricated the legal justification in their memos.
He said the prosecutor could try to bring charges of aiding and abetting torture, or conspiracy, to do so.
But Fein, who said there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation into top Bush Administration officials over the interrogations, questioned the logic of targeting lawyers who did not by themselves order any interrogations.
David Rivkin, an attorney and member of the Council on Foreign Relations who has argued that the memos prove the Bush Administration did not torture, gave a similar opinion. (ANI)
- Seven ex-CIA chiefs urge Obama not to reopen torture cases against CIA employees - Sep 19, 2009
- Regan-era lawyer drafts Obama impeachment over Libya intervention - Apr 08, 2011
- US appoints prosecutor to investigate detainee abuses - Aug 25, 2009
- Torture Memo Authors Did Not Commit Misconduct, Says DOJ - Feb 21, 2010
- Obama releases CIA interrogation memos - Apr 17, 2009
- Obama administration to continue terrorism trials in civilian court despite criticism - Nov 19, 2010
- Justice Department memos prove US did not torture - Apr 18, 2009
- 2002 War Detainees Became Medical Experiments During Interrogations, Say Doctors - Jun 08, 2010
- Names Of Agency Lawyers Omitted In Memo To Destroy CIA Terror Tapes - Jul 27, 2010
- CIA makes a glaring omission while destroying the water boarding terror tapes - Jul 27, 2010
- 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed faces New York trial (Second Lead) - Nov 14, 2009
- Torture memos' release to impact US counter terrorism: Stratfor - Apr 30, 2009
- 'Bush could be arrested abroad over sanctioning 'waterboarding' of terror suspects' - Nov 10, 2010
- Ex-CIA Director Porter Goss Upset Over Destruction of Al Qaeda Interrogation Videos, Had Not Approved It - Apr 18, 2010
- Waterboarding is torture, declares Obama's top lawyer nominee - Jan 16, 2009
Tags: barack obama, bruce fein, bush administration officials, cia agents, constitutional lawyer, department move, doug burns, eric holder, former federal prosecutor, fox news, interrogation methods, legal analysts, legal justification, legal opinion, political backlash, predecessors, prison sentences, prosecutions, torture memos, us justice department
