Is it safe to hire someone with a criminal record?May 28th, 2009 - 12:42 pm ICT by IANS
Washington, May 28 (IANS) Researchers set out to address the question whether it is safe to hire someone with a criminal record and found it was, as long as the person had remained “clean” for five years.
Carnegie Mellon University scientists created a model for obtaining empirical evidence on when an ex-convict has been “clean” long enough to be considered “redeemed” for a job.
The study, funded by The National Institute of Justice, used criminal-history records of more than 88,000 first-time offenders in New York in 1980.
Most committed new crimes within the first few years after their initial arrest, but only a small minority had a new arrest after staying clean for at least five years.
After determining whether the offenders had remained clean during the ensuing 25 years, the data on the 1980 offenders was compared against two comparison groups.
The study determined that after five years of staying clean, an individual with a criminal record is of no greater risk of committing another crime than other individuals of the same age.
The research comes at a time when President Barack Obama’s crime agenda includes breaking down job barriers for people who have a prior criminal record, but who have stayed clean since their earlier offence.
“In the past, employers had no way of knowing when it might be safe to look past a criminal record,” said Alfred Blumstein, co-author of the study and the professor of urban systems and operations research at Carnegie Mellon’s H. John Heinz III College.
“Hiring an ex-offender was a totally arbitrary decision. We believe our model can change that and help provide employers with data in making such decisions. Or it can be used by state criminal-record repositories in deciding when a prior arrest is too ’stale’ to warrant distributing.”
The issue of employing ex-offenders has become more of a problem, as a vast majority of larger US employers now perform criminal background checks, Blumstein said.
Blumstein noted that advances in information technology allow criminal records to be kept longer and to be distributed easily, and employers are concerned about liability risk if the former offender commits a new crime, said a Carnegie Mellon release.
Blumstein said this makes it difficult for a large number of people who have committed crimes when they were much younger, but have stayed clean since then.
The study appears in the current issue of Criminology.
Tags: alfred blumstein, arbitrary decision, barack obama, carnegie mellon university, comparison groups, criminal background checks, criminal history records, criminal record, empirical evidence, first few years, first time offenders, initial arrest, john heinz iii, least five years, national institute of justice, new crimes, record repositories, small minority, university scientists, urban systems