‘Haneef’s plight underlines need for public scrutiny of terror laws’
September 22nd, 2008 - 6:48 pm ICT by IANSSydney, Sep 22 (IANS) A public forum held here Monday on Indian doctor Muhammad Haneef’s botched terrorism case has been told that robust public scrutiny is the key to ensuring Australia’s terrorism laws strike the right balance between community protection and respect for individual rights.“We have long argued that our anti-terrorism laws strike the wrong balance between community safety and individual freedoms,” Law Council of Australia president Ross Ray told the forum convened by the Justice John Clarke inquiry investigating the series of events from the arrest of Haneef at Brisbane International Airport on July 2, 2007, until his release from detention and return home about a month later.
“As the Haneef case demonstrates, the content of these laws is only part of the problem. The difficulties endured by Dr. Haneef have shown us that the way these laws are understood and applied by the officers responsible for their implementation is also a problem,” Ray told the forum, joining a panel of legal and law enforcement experts.
Haneef, a former Gold Coast registrar, was incarcerated in Australia for three weeks last July after being charged with supporting a terrorist organisation by “recklessly” giving his mobile phone SIM card to people planning the botched London and Glasgow bomb attacks.
The charges against Haneef were dropped and he returned to his family in Bangalore on July 29 last year. His work visa was reinstated last December by the new Labour Immigration Minister Chris Evans.
Recently, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) dropped its investigation, after over a year of pursuing the botched terrorism case against Haneef that has caused the AFP much embarrassment and cost the taxpayer A$8.5 million.
Haneef’s lawyer Peter Russo, who had flown in from Brisbane for the forum aptly entitled “Too safe or too sorry”, told IANS: “The inquiry is very important to get a clearer picture of what exactly happened.”
Queensland Health Minister Stephen Robertson recently told Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio Haneef had been treated “absolutely appallingly” and was welcome to return to work in Queensland.
Haneef’s lawyer Rod Hodgson has said his client would be seeking compensation after the federal inquiry into the case was over. “We have made no secret of the fact that he will be seeking compensation for the immense damage to his career, his family and his reputation.”
The Clarke Inquiry will report its findings on Nov 14.
- Australia apologises to Indian-origin doctor - Dec 23, 2010
- Australia is good place to live, says Haneef - Dec 18, 2010
- Oz Govt. agrees to give Indian origin doctor substantial payout for wrong terror allegation - Dec 21, 2010
- Haneef to get 'substantial' compensation from Australia - Dec 21, 2010
- Haneef's lawyer silent on '$1m Oz Govt compensation' Indian media report claim - Dec 22, 2010
- Dr Haneef's lawyer Rod Hodgson receives justice award in Australia - Feb 18, 2011
- Minister who revoked Haneef's visa to face inquiry - Oct 14, 2008
- Australian police drop terror probe against Haneef - Aug 29, 2008
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef returning back to Australia for compensation talks - Nov 22, 2010
- Haneef sues former Australian minister - Jul 01, 2010
- Aussie Police had found jihadist materials in Dr Haneefs flat after arrest - Oct 23, 2008
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef eyeing huge payout from Oz govt. over 2007 ordeal - Dec 18, 2010
- Oz Govt. issues formal apology to Indian-origin Dr. Haneef over wrongful arrest - Dec 23, 2010
- Haneef posed no threat, says Australian security agency - Jul 29, 2008
- Judicial enquiry into Haneef's saga begins Wednesday - Apr 29, 2008
Tags: australian federal police, brisbane international airport, dr haneef, former gold coast, immigration minister, law council of australia, law enforcement experts, muhammad haneef, peter russo, public scrutiny