Haneef should never have been charged, admits Oz prosecutorNovember 14th, 2007 - 2:08 am ICT by admin
Dr Haneef was charged with a terrorism-related offence on July 14, but released when the DPP withdrew its charge on July 27.
The review found there were “errors of fact” made during the Australian Federal Police-led investigation.
The review, conducted by an unnamed private lawyer, concluded that the DPP’s office has not properly appreciated the evidence against Dr Haneef, and had not given appropriate advice before he was charged.
“The DPP has learnt from this matter and will take further steps to ensure that advice is provided in accordance with the role of the DPP in situations such as this,” Bugg said.
Dr Haneef was charged in July with recklessly assisting a terrorist organisation said to consist of his cousins Sabeel and Kafeel Ahmed.
Dr Haneef had left an old SIM card with his cousin Sabeel in Liverpool, England. At first, it was believed the SIM card was found at the scene of the crime. Then it was learnt the card was still in Liverpool.
The review concluded: “That change was not appreciated by the prosecutor at the time.”
Bugg said that the DPP is supposed to ask “whether the evidence establishes reasonable prospects of conviction” but the review found “the advice in this case did not address that test”.
Peter Russo, Dr Haneef’s lawyer, welcomed this confirmation of defence claims from the outset that the police and prosecutors’ case was flawed with factual errors.
“The best that can be said is that it is comforting to know the DPP is learning from its mistakes,” The Sydney Morning Herald quoted Russo, as saying.
Dr Haneef is still fighting to get his Australian visa back. The case would be heard on November 15. (ANI)
- I cautioned DPP that Haneef case was weak: AFP Commissioner - Nov 14, 2007
- Australia apologises to Indian-origin doctor - Dec 23, 2010
- Haneef to get 'substantial' compensation from Australia - Dec 21, 2010
- Haneef's lawyer silent on '$1m Oz Govt compensation' Indian media report claim - Dec 22, 2010
- Haneef's lawyer surprised by Oz police chief's comment - Nov 14, 2007
- Oz Govt. agrees to give Indian origin doctor substantial payout for wrong terror allegation - Dec 21, 2010
- Dr. Haneef says 'traumatic' wrongful arrest in Oz marred his 'family-career' reputation - Dec 17, 2010
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef eyeing huge payout from Oz govt. over 2007 ordeal - Dec 18, 2010
- Oz police ignored evidence on Haneef's innocence - Apr 14, 2008
- Wrongly implicated Haneef awaits results of inquiry against Oz authorities. - Dec 21, 2008
- Haneef sues former Australian minister - Jul 01, 2010
- Blame game over Dr Haneef terrorism case breaks out Down Under - Oct 24, 2008
- Australia is good place to live, says Haneef - Dec 18, 2010
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef returning back to Australia for compensation talks - Nov 22, 2010
- Oz Polices secret file had no incriminating terror evidence against Dr Haneef - Aug 15, 2008
Tags: australian federal police, australian visa, bugg, comforting to know, dpp, evidence, factual errors, investigation, liverpool england, outset, peter russo, private lawyer, prosecutor, scene of the crime, sim card, still fighting, sydney morning herald, terrorist organisation