Gallons per mile defines vehicles fuel efficiency better than miles per gallonJune 20th, 2008 - 12:30 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, June 20 (ANI): Duke University researchers say that posting a vehicles fuel efficiency in gallons per mile instead of miles per gallon will enable customers to make better decisions regarding car purchases and environmental impact.
Richard Larrick and Jack Soll, management professors at the university’s Fuqua School of Business, say that a series of experiments they have conducted show that the current standard, miles per gallon (mpg), leads consumers to believe that fuel consumption is reduced at an even rate as efficiency improves.
Writing about their study in the journal Science, the researchers have revealed that people presented with a series of car choices, wherein fuel efficiency was defined in mpg, were not able to easily identify the choice that would result in the greatest gains in fuel efficiency.
Most people ranked an improvement from 34 to 50 mpg as saving more gas over 10,000 miles than an improvement from 18 to 28 mpg, even though the latter saves twice as much gas.
The researchers point out that going from 34 to 50 mpg would save 94 gallons, while from 18 to 28 mpg would sae 198 gallons.
However, when the researchers presented the participants with fuel efficiency expressed in gallons used per 100 miles, such mistaken impressions were corrected.
According to them, 18 mpg becomes 5.5 gallons per 100 miles, while 28 mpg is 3.6 gallons per 100 miles
“The reality that few people appreciate is that improving fuel efficiency from 10 to 20 mpg is actually a more significant savings than improving from 25 to 50 mpg for the same distance of driving,” Larrick said.
Soll says that replacing a large vehicle that gets 10 mpg with one that gets 20 mpg reduces gas use per 100 miles from 10 gallons to five, a 5-gallon savings.
He further says that replacing a small vehicle that gets 25 mpg with one that gets 50 mpg reduces gas use per 100 miles from 4 gallons to 2, a saving of only 2 gallons.
“Miles per gallon is misleading and can play tricks on our intuitions. For families and other owners of more than one type of vehicle, the greatest fuel savings often comes from improving the efficiency of the less efficient car. When fuel efficiency is expressed as gallons per 100 miles, it becomes clear which combination of cars will save a family the most gas,” Soll said.
“We believe that everyone should try to be as fuel efficient as possible. For some people, that may mean driving the most efficient car available, such as a small hybrid car, but for others it may mean finding the most efficient option possible within their chosen class of car. There are significant savings to be had by improving efficiency by even two or three miles per gallon on inefficient cars, but because we communicate in miles per gallon, that savings is not immediately evident to consumers,” Soll added.
The authors of the study suggest that consumer publications and car manufacturers list efficiency in terms of gallons per 10,000 miles driven, which is already the standard in many other countries.
“This measure makes it easy to see how much gas one might use in a given year of driving and how much gas, and money, can be saved by opting for a car with greater efficiency,” Larrick said. (ANI)
Tags: car purchases, choices, consumers, decisions, duke university, environmental impact, fuel consumption, fuel efficiency, fuqua school of business, impressions, journal science, management professors, miles per gallon, mpg, participants, school of business, university researchers, will enable customers