Facebook’s decision to guard ‘illegal contents’ spurs debate over free speech on internetDecember 13th, 2010 - 3:17 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Dec 13 (ANI): The step taken by social networking site Facebook to establish a “hate and harassment team” as part of a virtual police squad charged with taking down content that is illegal or violates Facebook’s terms of service, has spurred debate over freedom of speech on the Internet.
The Facebook’s move came into sharp focus last week after whistleblower website ‘Wikileaks’ created a hue and cry across the world over its release of hundreds of secret US diplomatic cables.
According to The New York Times, Facebook took down a page used by WikiLeaks supporters to organize hacking attacks on the sites of such companies, including PayPal and MasterCard.
It said that the page violated the terms of service, which prohibit material that is hateful, threatening, pornographic or incites violence or illegal acts. However, it did not remove WikiLeaks’s own Facebook pages.
Over 500 million members upload more than one billion pieces of content a day on Facebook, and therefore the site’s move to guard such content would likely make the question of free speech in the internet very prominent.
“Facebook has more power in determining who can speak and who can be heard around the globe than any Supreme Court justice, any king or any president. It is important that Facebook is exercising its power carefully and protecting more speech rather than less,” the paper quoted Jeffrey Rosen, a law professor at George Washington University who has written about free speech on the Internet, as saying.
Earlier decisions by the company not to remove material related to Holocaust denial or pages critical of Islam and other religions had annoyed advocacy groups and prompted some foreign governments to temporarily block the site. (ANI)
- Facebook won't block Wikileaks page for now - Dec 07, 2010
- WikiLeaks suspends publishing - Oct 25, 2011
- Now, mini WikiLeaks on web, US cautions Switzerland over Assange asylum offer - Dec 06, 2010
- 'WikiLeaks bid for transparency derailed' - Mar 23, 2012
- US-based Amazon.com stops hosting Wikileaks on its Web servers - Dec 02, 2010
- Now, Internet 'hacktivists' target Amazon for refusing trade with WikiLeaks - Dec 10, 2010
- Amazon stops hosting WikiLeaks - Dec 02, 2010
- Mirrors will make it 'impossible to shut down WikiLeaks' - Dec 07, 2010
- PayPal says it blocked WikiLeaks after U.S. government request - Dec 08, 2010
- US targets Twitter to trap Assange over 'secret diplomatic cables' revelations - Feb 15, 2011
- 'Assange bringing WikiLeaks down' - Dec 23, 2010
- Hackers target credit card firms in revenge for Assange - Dec 09, 2010
- Bank of America Stops Dealings With WikiLeaks - Dec 19, 2010
- Social media content creators need protection: Experts - Mar 29, 2012
- WikiLeaks nominated for Nobel Peace Prize - Feb 03, 2011
Tags: advocacy groups, facebook, free speech, freedom of speech, george washington, george washington university, holocaust denial, hue and cry, illegal acts, illegal contents, jeffrey rosen, law professor, new york times, one billion, paypal, police squad, social networking site, spurs, supreme court justice, wikileaks