‘Eye cream is a waste of money’May 1st, 2008 - 11:34 am ICT by admin
Hamburg, May 1 (DPA) Consumers should not base their decisions about buying cosmetics on the price and image of a brand, according to Paula Begoun, a cosmetics expert in the US who has spent more than two decades explaining the fine print on cosmetics product packages. Begoun, 55, says it’s always better to read the fine print to find out what’s in the creams and something about the companies that make them.
She uses published research to support her work and investigates herself whether a product, with its particular ingredients, can deliver what it promises, and how it is different from other similar products. She also assesses how well the product can be tolerated and possible allergic reactions.
Begoun, who refers to herself as the cosmetics cop, worked for years selling cosmetics and has written several books about cosmetics. She says the cosmetics industry makes a lot of false claims. Expensive eye creams, for example, are a waste of money; they don’t have to cost a lot to be good.
Among her other complaints about the industry’s claims are those made about creams for wrinkles and cellulite. There are none that can make them disappear.
Creams can indeed decrease wrinkles, but cannot completely prevent them. There is no scientific proof of anything else. Begoun also said it is incorrect to believe that natural ingredients are always better than synthetic ones.
On the contrary, there are some natural ingredients that bring out skin reactions and there are very good synthetic ingredients.
Begoun, author of the book “Don’t Go To the Cosmetics Counter Without Me”, advises consumers not to use products that contain denatured alcohol because it destroys collagen, disrupts the skin’s self-healing ability and causes the skin’s protective layer to break down.
Consumers should be aware that fragrances can also irritate the skin. Examples are peppermint and menthol. She says the best protection against the skin’s ageing is still a daily cream that includes a sunscreen. Using such a cream has far more influence on the skin than nutrition.
In addition, products that are packaged in tubes or dispensers are better than those packaged in small jars because light and air can destroy the active ingredients, she says.
One category in which there is an especially high number of bad products is facial toner. While it’s difficult to make a bad lipstick or rouge, facial toners are a different story.
Of hundreds she has examined closely, she has found that most amount to very little - usually water, fragrance and glycerin. In order to indeed nourish the skin, a toner must contain antioxidants, she said.
- How to keep your skin glowing during monsoon - Jul 04, 2012
- Looking attractive propels people to buy cosmetics - Jul 22, 2011
- For soft summer skin, cut out fizzy drinks, eat healthy - Apr 24, 2010
- How companies make you buy cosmetics? (Lead) - Jul 22, 2011
- Campaign launched against animal testing for cosmetics - Apr 24, 2012
- Victoria Beckham gets anti-ageing facial - May 22, 2012
- Firm files for patent on cracked heel healing kit - Apr 13, 2011
- Moisturizer 'more than enough to keep wrinkles at bay' - Jun 01, 2010
- Women-driven natural cosmetics finds growing takers - Jul 25, 2010
- Herbal products driving Indian cosmetics market - Jun 03, 2010
- Anti-ageing creams could cause cancer - Oct 08, 2009
- Giving up menthol ciggies may be harder for some smokers - Dec 21, 2010
- Forget botox, moisturisers best for wrinkles - Jun 02, 2010
- End animal testing for cosmetics: Paul McCartney - Jul 09, 2012
- 10 do's and don'ts for a healthy, glowing skin - Nov 15, 2010
Tags: ageing, allergic reactions, collagen, contrary, cosmetics cop, cosmetics industry, cosmetics product, denatured alcohol, eye cream, eye creams, fragrances, may 1, natural ingredients, peppermint, self healing, similar products, skin reactions, synthetic ingredients, waste of money, wrinkles