Critics say Obama war cabinet talks on Afghanistan could put troops in danger
October 9th, 2009 - 2:43 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Oct 9 (ANI): Though the U.S. has a distinct fighting advantage in fighting the global war on terrorism in Afghanistan, possessing more firepower, superior weapons and a larger fighting force, critics say the ongoing deliberations at the White House in Washington are putting American troops at a distinct disadvantage — and in harm’s way.
“When [the Taliban] see us acting in an unsure manner, they’re able to go out to all the villages and different people and say America is going to pull out,” Representative Duncan Hunter told Fox News, adding that Taliban forces will use that argument to gain support.
“Counterinsurgency policy means we go in and get the Afghan people on our side. Make friends. The opposite of that is nobody wants to be our friend,” said Duncan, a Marine who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Obama is currently weighing whether sending more troops to Afghanistan, as requested by General Stanley McCrystal, the top U.S. commander there.
The president’s war council appears to be divided. Some support Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s request for up to 40,000 more troops on the ground, while others favor scaling back the effort and focusing on attacking Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
There are also political considerations for Obama: many of his fellow Democrats oppose an escalation while Republicans, who are largely opposed to his domestic agenda, largely support a troop buildup.
The Taliban, on the other hand, have no such domestic considerations. Bent on regaining control of Afghanistan by any means necessary, they do not have to face the same issues or political ramifications of their decisions.
“That hits the nail right on the head,” said Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a former Army intelligence officer who served under McChrystal and is now a reservist with the Center of Advanced Defense Studies. “We’re dealing with an enemy that doesn’t have to worry about oversight.”
“The current policy is not going to win us the war,” Shaffer said.
The dilemma facing the White House isn’t new. Ever since Vietnam, administrations have struggled with Americans’ low tolerance for casualties. (ANI)
- 'Angry' Obama recalls Afghan commander to Washington - Jun 23, 2010
- Obama in dilemma over sacking McChrystal, Afghan war effort - Jun 23, 2010
- Obama Speaks: Gen Stanley McChrystal Resigns & Gen David Petraeus Steps In - Jun 24, 2010
- Afghan Govt. backs Obama's decision to appoint Petraeus as new NATO boss - Jun 24, 2010
- Afghan war is at a stalemate: General McChrystal - May 14, 2010
- US commander McChrystal derides Vice-President Biden, Holbrooke and envoy - Jun 22, 2010
- Obama fires top Afghanistan commander - Jun 24, 2010
- 'Runaway General' McChrystal Summoned by Obama Over 'Rolling Stone' Article - Jun 23, 2010
- Afghanistan disappointed with McChrystal's dismissal, hopeful about Petraeus - Jun 24, 2010
- General McChrystal to retire after Afghanistan firing - Jun 29, 2010
- Petraeus vows to keep Afghan civilian deaths down - Jul 01, 2010
- Petraeus to take control of Afghan NATO forces Sunday - Jul 04, 2010
- Obama may favour sending 30,000 troops to Afghanistan - Nov 10, 2009
- Obama to grant request for more troops in Afghanistan: Report - Nov 10, 2009
- Top US commander in Afghanistan resigns (Lead) - Jun 24, 2010
Tags: american troops, anthony shaffer, army intelligence officer, distinct disadvantage, domestic agenda, duncan hunter, fellow democrats, fighting force, firepower, fox news, global war on terrorism, political considerations, political ramifications, regaining control, representative duncan hunter, reservist, taliban forces, war cabinet, war council, war on terrorism
