Climate scientist involved in emails controversy says he did no wrong
November 16th, 2010 - 2:04 pm ICT by ANILondon, Nov. 16 (ANI): A year after he was accused of being at the centre of a political and scientific storm over hundreds of leaked climate science emails, researcher Dr. Phil Jones remains unrepentant, and claims that he did no wrong.In an interview with the journal Nature to coincide with the anniversary of the emails’ release, Jones says he did nothing wrong.
He said he did not illegally delete emails that had been requested under freedom of information laws. He also retracted a pledge made earlier in the year to correct one of his papers.
Jones said he was now more careful about what he wrote.
“I’m a little more guarded about what I say in e-mails now. One thing in particular I’m doing is not responding so quickly. I might have got an e-mail in the past and responded with an instant thought in the next 10 to 15 minutes, whereas now I might leave it a day,” The Guardian quoted Dr. Jones, as saying.
But he argued that scientists should be able to express themselves in personal messages.
“People would be saying much the same things at scientific meetings and discussed [them] over dinner. But in an e-mail, it is recorded. People have probably forgotten what you said after a night out,” he said.
The personal emails and documents were stolen from the University of East Anglia’s (UEA) servers in November last year and leaked onto the Internet.
Climate sceptics seized on the contents as evidence that apparently showed Jones and his colleagues colluding to keep errors in their research hidden and prevent rivals’ research from being published at all.
Jones temporarily stood down from his post as head of the UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) while investigations were launched into his and his colleagues’ conduct.
Jones and his team at CRU were cleared of any misconduct in an independent inquiry headed by former civil servant Sir Muir Russell earlier this year, who looked at whether the researchers had committed fraud or some other type of scientific misbehavior. (ANI)
- 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty over data presentation - Jul 08, 2010
- British climate scientist steps down over leaked emails - Dec 02, 2009
- British 'climategate' scientists cleared of wrongdoing - Apr 14, 2010
- 'Climategate' scientist considered suicide following e-mail row - Feb 07, 2010
- Scientist admits sending 'awful' e-mails that suppressed data on climate change - Mar 02, 2010
- East Anglia University climate scientists cleared by inquiry - Apr 15, 2010
- Climate Depot Reveals Alleged Global Warming Conspiracy - Nov 21, 2009
- Row over 'rigged' climate change data haunts summit - Dec 08, 2009
- Scientists Of The Met Office Assert That Numerous Studies Have Generated Incontrovertible Proof Of Global Warming - Jul 29, 2010
- Climate emails in East Anglia may have been hacked by foreign intelligence agency - Feb 01, 2010
- Pachauri takes on climate change sceptics - Dec 07, 2009
- 'Climategate' undermined belief in global warming among TV meteorologists: Study - Feb 23, 2011
- Climate expert admits loss of crucial weather data was 'not acceptable' - Feb 16, 2010
- Climate change science is "robust", not a "house of cards" - Feb 24, 2010
- No interference in resolving Bhopal issue: US - Aug 20, 2010
Tags: civil servant, climate science, climate scientist, climatic research unit, dr jones, dr phil, e mail, east anglia, freedom of information, freedom of information laws, independent inquiry, internet climate, journal nature, muir russell, personal emails, personal messages, researcher, rivals, uea, university of east anglia