Censorship of social media fans public unrestJuly 3rd, 2012 - 3:01 pm ICT by IANS
London, July 3 (IANS) Is social media censorship a means to quell a modern uprising? Politicians and law enforcers thought so in the context of last year’s political turbulence.
But recent research suggests that uncensored citizens experience less violence and longer periods of peace between outbursts than communities subject to censorship.
A consensus is forming around internet censorship in the wake of last year’s uprisings, extending from the Arab Spring to the UK, according to Antonio Casilli, associate professor in digital humanities at Telecom ParisTech, France, and Paola Tubaro, senior lecturer in economic sociology at the University of Greenwich, UK, the journal Bulletin of Sociological Methodology reports.
“In the absence of robust indicators as to the rebelliousness of a given society, the choice of not restricting social communication turns out to be a judicious one for avoiding the surrender of democratic values and freedom of expression for an illusory sense of security,” say Casilli and Tubaro.
The authors used sophisticated computer modelling to find out if the assumptions that actors’ use of media - such as Twitter - fuelled mob action through greater awareness were true, according to a Greenwich statement.
The researchers used state-of-the-art agent-based modelling as a starting point. Political conflict is often described as cumulative, involving ‘escalating’ conflict and sometimes ending with regime change.
In Casilli and Tubaro’s computer simulation, censorship narrows down vision. It interrupts the flow of communication and decreases the ability of individuals to appreciate their environment. In this sense, censorship blinds social actors to their own context.
The researchers found that all possible scenarios led to initial outbursts of violence but how the situation evolved was significantly influenced by government social media censorship.
In a total censorship scenario, similar to the Egyptian riots, violence levels remained at a maximum. Stronger censorship led to an increase in the average level of endemic violence over time.
- Social media powering modern protests, note experts - Apr 17, 2012
- 'Why censor Facebook when you don't censor Sunny Leone?' - Dec 07, 2011
- Punish those who call for violence on web: Medvedev - Nov 22, 2011
- Censoring social media curbs free speech, say netizens - Jan 16, 2012
- Action only against sites spreading rumours: Shinde - Aug 24, 2012
- Tweetographer helps locate the hot and happening - Nov 09, 2011
- Men's potency crashes when wives bond with male buddies - Aug 09, 2011
- Atheists among scientists spiritually oriented - May 08, 2011
- Russia urges Syria to call off troops - Apr 03, 2012
- Playboy's uncensored pictures will soon be available on iPad - Jan 20, 2011
- Social media content creators need protection: Experts - Mar 29, 2012
- Care for elders strains adult parent-child relationship - Jul 27, 2010
- Ties with China of great importance to India: Antony - Nov 12, 2010
- Osama wanted Obama killed - May 14, 2011
- Government denies censorship as Twitter agrees to block imposter sites (Lead) - Aug 24, 2012
Tags: art agent, computer simulation, digital humanities, economic sociology, freedom of expression, internet censorship, law enforcers, media censorship, media fans, methodology reports, mob action, political conflict, political turbulence, public unrest, senior lecturer, social actors, sociological methodology, university of greenwich, university of greenwich uk, values and freedom