British court rules alleged terrorists may be tortured in Pakistan
May 18th, 2010 - 10:21 pm ICT by IANSLondon, May 18 (DPA) Two Pakistani students who were arrested - but never charged - in Britain on suspicion of terrorism will not be deported to Pakistan because of fears over their possible torture and ill-treatment, a British immigration tribunal ruled Tuesday.
Abid Naseer and Ahmed Faraz Khan, both in their 20s, were among more than a dozen men arrested in a massive anti-terrorism raid in the northern cities of Manchester and Liverpool in April 2009.
They were suspected of having plotted a “mass casualty attack,” possibly on a shopping centre, but never charged because of lack of evidence. No explosives or bomb-making materials were ever found.
Tuesday, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), a body set up as a result of human rights legislation, ruled that they could not be deported.
At the same time, SIAC ruled said that Naseer was an “Al Qaeda operative who posed and still poses a serious threat to the national security to the UK,” while Khan had been “willing to participate” in the alleged plans.
A third man, Shoaib Khan, who has returned to Pakistan, also won his appeal against exclusion from Britain.
The government’s new Home Secretary, Theresa May, said she was disappointed with the decision, but would not appeal. “As the court agreed, they are a security risk to the UK. We are now taking all possible measures to ensure they do not engage in terrorist activity,” May said.
In their ruling, judge John Mitting and two colleagues said they could not accept that a “sufficient safeguard” existed against prohibited ill-treatment of the men on return.
“Despite the restoration of a democratically-elected parliament and government, after eight years of military rule, Pakistan remains a state dominated by its military and intelligence agencies,” said the ruling.
“There is a long and well-documented history of disappearances, illegal detention and of the torture and ill-treatment of those detained, usually to produce information, a confession or compliance.”
Alex Carlile, a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords, and Britain’s ombudsman for terrorist legislation, said it would be a “shocking situation” if Britain and Pakistan - as friendly nations - were “not able to guarantee the safety of people sent to each other’s countries”.
- Brit court blasts 'democratic' Pak for being subservient to military, intelligence - May 21, 2010
- Court fears torture in Pakistan, says no to deporting Al Qaeda men - May 19, 2010
- Pak 'terror suspect' students win court battle against deportation from Britain - May 18, 2010
- European Human Rights court rulings making UK 'safe heaven' for foreign terrorists' - Feb 04, 2011
- EU rights rulings having a 'chilling effect' on public safety, warns peer - Apr 21, 2011
- Pakistani men discussing girls were planning terror attack - Mar 10, 2010
- Watchdog says websites pose biggest terror threat to UK - Jul 23, 2010
- London court allows Russian female spy suspect to work for Russian TV - Mar 19, 2011
- We don't condone torture, says Omar on Kashmir WikiLeaks - Dec 17, 2010
- US Justice Department puts Pak-origin terror suspect on its wanted list - Dec 16, 2010
- Jailed Pakistan cricketers face deportation from Britain - Nov 12, 2011
- Hindus and Jews laud Sweden for "white book" on Roma maltreatment and ask Europe to follow - Feb 01, 2011
- Pak student arrested in Britain charged for planning attacks in US - Jul 08, 2010
- Britain wastes millions on deporting migrants - Apr 12, 2012
- Britain deports Pakistani convicted for child sex crimes - May 31, 2011
Tags: abid, ahmed faraz, british immigration, dozen men, faraz khan, human rights legislation, illegal detention, immigration appeals, intelligence agencies, judge john, mass casualty, military rule, naseer, northern cities, pakistani students, qaeda operative, security risk, shoaib khan, special immigration appeals commission, theresa may