Blair neglected intelligence report warning that Saddam didn’t have WMD
December 9th, 2009 - 2:43 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )London, Dec. 9 (ANI): Just days before the Iraq invasion, Tony Blair received two intelligence reports saying that Saddam Hussain did not possess working weapons of mass destruction, but the former British Prime Minister did not respond to them, an inquiry panel in the Iraq war has revealed.
The Times quoted Sir John Scarlett, the former chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, as saying that Blair ignored the reports, which had crucial military significance.
Regretting the claim made by the MI6 that Saddam could deploy WMD within 45 minutes, Sir John distanced himself from Blair’s claim that six months before the invasion that “intelligence had established beyond doubt” that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
According to him, British Intelligence received a report 13 days before the invasion saying that Saddam did not have missiles that could reach Israel and none that could carry biological or chemical weapons.
A further report, received on the eve of the war in March 2003, said that Iraq’s chemical weapons had been dispersed and that Saddam had not ordered them to be reassembled.
“I was certainly working absolutely on the basis that these updates were at this stage being read carefully. The consequence of concealing is they would be difficult to use and that was highly relevant because it would be difficult to use against US, UK military forces. So I am pretty sure it was taken on board,” he said.
Sir John drew up the Government’s dossier in September 2002, which contained the controversial claim that Saddam could deploy WMD within 45 minutes.
However, the inquiry panel refused to question him in public about allegations that the “45-minute” claim was based on gossip from a taxi driver who had overheard a conversation between Iraqi army officers two years before the invasion. (ANI)
- I would have invaded Iraq, WMDs or not: Tony Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- Blair knew 10 days in advance before Iraq war that Saddam did not have WMD - Nov 26, 2009
- Blair was warned by 27 lawyers 'Iraq invasion without UN backing was illegal' - Jan 27, 2010
- Blair's Govt. 'intentionally and substantially' exaggerated WMD threat - Jul 13, 2010
- Britain went to war with Iraq on "assumption" of WMDs: Jonathan Powell - Jan 19, 2010
- US was high on military before Iraq invasion: Hans Blix - Jul 28, 2010
- Saddam's 45-minute WMD launch claim was included in dossier "for local colour" - Jan 21, 2010
- Iraq invasion was right even if Saddam Hussein didn't possess WMD: Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- Malaysian mock tribunal finds Bush, Blair guilty of 'crimes against peace' - Nov 24, 2011
- Iraq war inquiry opens, NRI in inquisition panel - Nov 24, 2009
- UK would not have invaded Iraq 'if we knew what we know now': Miliband - Apr 20, 2010
- Blair's Iraq war 'gave Bin Laden his jihad,' claims ex MI5 Chief - Jul 21, 2010
- UK inquiry committee to hear Blair give Iraq War evidence, but in secret - Dec 13, 2009
- Secret memos expose link between UK Govt, oil firms and invasion of Iraq - Apr 19, 2011
- 'Defiant' Blair insists Saddam Hussein posed WMD threat to world at Iraq war inquiry - Jan 30, 2010
Tags: army officers, british intelligence, british prime minister, chemical weapons, controversial claim, hussain, inquiry panel, intelligence report, intelligence reports, iraq invasion, iraq war, iraqi army, joint intelligence committee, mi6, military forces, military significance, sir john, taxi driver, tony blair, weapons of mass destruction