Blair knew 10 days in advance before Iraq war that Saddam did not have WMD
November 26th, 2009 - 1:35 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )London, Nov 26 (ANI): Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government knew ten days in advance before declaring war on Iraq that Saddam Hussein did not have access to weapons of mass destruction, according to the inquiry into the war.
Inspectors in Iraq had informed the Foreign and Commonwealth Office that they believed that Saddam might not have chemical and biological weapons, but the new intelligence report was dismissed with British and US troops massed on the border.
The then Foreign Office’s director-general of defence and intelligence, Sir William Ehrman, told the inquiry that information was received just before the invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, The Times reported.
“We did at the very end, I think on March 10, get a report that chemical weapons might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn’t yet ordered their assembly. There was also a suggestion that Iraq might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents,” he said.
“I don’t think it invalidated the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use. From the counter-proliferation point of view it just proved [Saddam] had been lying and that he had prohibited items,” he said.
Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, told the Foreign Office at the end of February 2003 that Saddam might not have weapons of mass destruction, the inquiry was told.
Blair continued to say there was a risk to national security from WMD without mentioning the new intelligence.
Tim Dowse, the Foreign Office’s head of counter-proliferation at the time, said that in 2001 the threat from Iraq had been placed behind those from Iran, Libya and North Korea. (ANI)
- US was high on military before Iraq invasion: Hans Blix - Jul 28, 2010
- Britain went to war with Iraq on "assumption" of WMDs: Jonathan Powell - Jan 19, 2010
- Blair neglected intelligence report warning that Saddam didn't have WMD - Dec 09, 2009
- Blair was warned by 27 lawyers 'Iraq invasion without UN backing was illegal' - Jan 27, 2010
- Iraq inquiry: Bush was determined to overthrow Saddam - Feb 09, 2010
- Blair's Govt. 'intentionally and substantially' exaggerated WMD threat - Jul 13, 2010
- I would have invaded Iraq, WMDs or not: Tony Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- UK would not have invaded Iraq 'if we knew what we know now': Miliband - Apr 20, 2010
- Iraq invasion was right even if Saddam Hussein didn't possess WMD: Blair - Dec 12, 2009
- Blair's Iraq war 'gave Bin Laden his jihad,' claims ex MI5 Chief - Jul 21, 2010
- Iraq invasion would not have happened if Bush was not misled on WMD: Aide - Mar 05, 2010
- Malaysian mock tribunal finds Bush, Blair guilty of 'crimes against peace' - Nov 24, 2011
- UK inquiry committee to hear Blair give Iraq War evidence, but in secret - Dec 13, 2009
- Saddam's 45-minute WMD launch claim was included in dossier "for local colour" - Jan 21, 2010
- 9/11 led to war decision, Blair tells Iraq probe - Jan 29, 2010
Tags: british prime minister, british prime minister tony blair, chemical and biological weapons, counter proliferation, declaring war on iraq, dowse, foreign and commonwealth, foreign and commonwealth office, former british prime minister tony blair, hans blix, intelligence report, invasion of iraq, minister tony blair, prime minister tony blair, saddam hussein, tony blair, war on iraq, weapons inspector, weapons of mass destruction, william ehrman