Anderson and Ponting differ on end-game strategy
July 13th, 2009 - 2:01 pm ICT by IANS ( 1 comment )London, July 13 (IANS) England’s batting hero Jimmy Anderson said Australian captain Ricky Ponting got it wrong by bowling part-time spinner Marcus North in the dramatic final overs of the drawn Cardiff Test, but the Australian captain defended his decision saying he used the off-spinner to squeeze in as many overs as possible.
As England held out for a nail-biting draw, Ponting bowled North for two of the final four overs at a time when Australia’s pacemen had been far more threatening to the last batting pair of Anderson and Monty Panesar. Offspinner Nathan Hauritz was bowling at the other end.
“Certainly when they put Marcus North on I thought we had a great chance, them putting a part time spinner on,” Anderson was quoted as saying by the Australian media.
“I thought, we’ve got a good chance here because Monty was playing it very well, we were communicating well together.”
Ponting vigorously justified using his spinners as he realised time was running out and he insisted Australia needed to bowl as many deliveries as possible at England’s last pair.
“Look, we were running a bit short of time,” Ponting said. “Once they forged that last partnership we needed to get as many balls into their batsmen as possible. A few other minutes were taken up by other things. Two left-handers being in, two offspinners being on, I thought we could create some chances.”
England skipper Andrew Strauss would not criticise Ponting’s tactics, but felt the tailenders would have found paceman Mitchell Johnson more difficult to face.
“I could understand what he was doing but personally I thought Mitchell Johnson would have been harder for these two to face,” Strauss said.
“Each captain sees things differently, I suppose. It’s a difficult situation when you’re trying to rush through overs when you get to the back end of the game there.
“I remember against the Aussies at Old Trafford in 2005, you always have regrets at the end of a game like that because you think if you’d done this differently you might have taken a wicket.
“The reality was that it was a very flat wicket and it was difficult to prise people out, especially if they showed application, which the second half of our order did,” said Strauss.
- Anderson says Ponting let England off the hook - Jul 13, 2009
- England in command after first day of Perth Ashes Test - Dec 16, 2010
- Hauritz unlikely to get nod for first Ashes Test on bouncy Gabba pitch - Oct 18, 2010
- Bedi slams Ponting's captaincy over 'wrong handling' of Hauritz - Oct 09, 2010
- Experts in favour of Khwaja and Harris in Oz Ashes squad - Oct 17, 2010
- Ashes Test: Ponting has got it right, says Benaud - Jul 12, 2009
- Aussies will need to make tough choices to take on India and the Poms - Sep 12, 2010
- Ponting to be tested over Johnson's poor form - Nov 29, 2010
- Australia still a force to reckon with in ODIs (Team Profile, World Cup Countdown) - Feb 07, 2011
- Much bragged about powers of the baggy green down to only Warne, McGrath: Hussain - Nov 30, 2010
- Aussies hope to blunt Lanka bowlers in WC clash - Mar 05, 2011
- England can replace ageing India as top Test side: Vaughan - Dec 31, 2010
- Vaughan: Cocky England took foot off the gas at Perth - Dec 20, 2010
- Strauss questions Johnson's axing for second Ashes Test - Dec 02, 2010
- Fletcher could come a cropper when he tours UK with Indian team: Swann - Apr 29, 2011
Tags: andrew strauss, aussies, australian captain, captain ricky ponting, cardiff, deliveries, end game, england skipper, final four, game strategy, good chance, jimmy anderson, left handers, mitchell johnson, monty panesar, nathan hauritz, old trafford, regrets, spinners, strategy london
October 22nd, 2009 at 8:37 pm
How do we apply monopoly game into a reality show game successfully?