Afghan leaders distrust threatens American war strategyMay 13th, 2010 - 1:43 pm ICT by ANI
Jalalabad (Afghanistan), May 13 (ANI): The success of the NATO offensive in the coming weeks in Kandahar, the Taliban heartland, may well depend on whether Afghans can overcome their corrosive distrust of President Hamid Karzai and his government, the New York Times reports.According to the paper, Afghan elders met Tuesday at a Marine base near Marja in Helmand Province, as part of an American plan to build mutual trust.But both Americans and Afghans have struggled to establish a local government that can win the loyalty of the Afghan people, something that is essential to keeping the Taliban at bay, it adds.Karzai was confronted with that issue when he met with American officials this week, including President Obama on Wednesday.
Both leaders are seeking to repair months of badly strained relations.
The insurgency has spread to some new places, notably the north and northwest of the country, although it has diminished in a few areas. It is now made up of more than half a dozen groups with different agendas, making it that much harder to defeat, or negotiate with, even if the Americans and Afghans could agree on a strategy for doing so.
In 120 districts that the Pentagon views as critical to Afghanistan’s future stability, only a quarter of residents view the government positively. And the government has full control in fewer than a half dozen of these districts.
According to Nader Nadery of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, 18 months is simply not enough to have a stable and secure Afghan government in place.
The current strategy inevitably will allow insurgents some havens, as long as those are in sparsely populated areas where they are unlikely to have much impact.
A NATO officer said Colonel George said he hoped that if he could embolden Afghan citizens to combat corruption in the more populated river valleys and provincial towns in their areas, they would at least create a government they could support.
Diplomats who have spent years in the country working with Afghans give the Americans credit for trying, but they warn that it is easy to underestimate the complexity of Afghan tribal relationships and the profound antipathy for the government. (ANI)
- Afghan insurgents in weakened state, claim US, NATO forces - Nov 15, 2010
- NATO troops hope to introduce appropriate government after ending Marja offensive: NYT - Feb 13, 2010
- Anti-Taliban tribal militias not paying off for the US as expected - Jun 20, 2010
- Clinton defends US Afghan war strategy after Karzai criticism - Nov 16, 2010
- US, Afghan commanders claim Taliban fleeing Marja stronghold in southern Afghanistan - Feb 16, 2010
- Initial phase of military offensive begins in Afghanistan - Feb 14, 2010
- Clinton warns of terrorists-pursuit on Afghan-Pakistan border - Oct 20, 2011
- Human rights groups in Afghanistan shift focus from NATO to atrocities by Taliban - Feb 10, 2011
- Oz elite forces giving military training to Afghan warlord's private army - Oct 29, 2010
- Real challenge of Marja offensive lies ahead: Top NATO commander - Feb 21, 2010
- Karzai urges US to reduce special 'night raid' operations in Afghanistan - Nov 15, 2010
- Eight die in Kabul attack after Obama trip (Second Lead) - May 02, 2012
- 'Do-or-die' Battle for Kandahar now likely to be mainly civilian reconstruction effort - Jun 09, 2010
- Afghan withdrawal date 'emboldens' Taliban - Sep 04, 2010
- Afghanistan tops worldwide asylum seekers list - Nov 28, 2010
Tags: afghan government, afghans, american officials, american war, colonel george, distrust, dozen groups, hamid karzai, human rights commission, independent human rights, jalalabad afghanistan, kandahar, marja, mutual trust, obama, president hamid karzai, provincial towns, river valleys, strained relations, war strategy