Wheels of justice: confirming Kasab’s death penalty may take eight months
May 9th, 2010 - 5:16 pm ICT by IANSBy Kanu Sarda
New Delhi, May 9 (IANS) If past trends are to go by, the Bombay High Court may take at least 253 days (8 months, 13 days) to confirm the death penalty given to Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone Pakistani gunman captured alive during the 2008 Mumbai terror attack.
A study of hundreds of judgements of the Bombay High Court, especially in the last 17 years, reveals that the average disposal time per case comes to 253 days.
As per the procedure, every death penalty awarded by a sessions court has to be confirmed by the state high court.
The state government has to formally approach the high court for confirmation of the sentence.
“The Bombay High Court has rejected the death penalty in 52 percent of the cases and only in 48 percent cases confirmed the sentence,” according to advocate K.V. Dhananjay, who has done the study along with a battery of other lawyers.
“Given the fact that Kasab has been sentenced to four distinct death penalties, from the statistical perspective, the possibility of the high court rejecting all four sentences is too remote and extremely unlikely. At least two death sentences are likely to be confirmed,” Dhananjay, who practices in the Supreme Court, told IANS.
“It is most likely that the Bombay High Court would stay the confirmation order of the death sentence for a period, generally of eight weeks, to allow the convict to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution,” Dhananjay added.
In case Kasab appeals, the Bombay High Court will combine the two cases - confirmation of death sentence and his appeal - to avoid diverse conclusions.
“The shortest time taken by the Bombay High Court in disposing of a confirmation case stands at 76 days, and the longest at 469 days. Accordingly, even if his appeals are heard on priority basis, the possibility of four distinct confirmation cases being disposed of in less than 253 days looks very remote,” added Dhananjay.
Another roadblock in hanging Kasab will come if the gunman appeals to the Supreme Court against the high court ruling and then files a clemency petition before the president.
“A clemency petition to the president is required to be made in respect of each death sentence. Accordingly, if Kasab wishes to seek pardon from the president, he would be required to submit four distinct clemency petitions,” said Dhananjay.
Kasab was last Thursday sentenced to death for his role in the 26/11 carnage by a special court in Mumbai. The Nov 26-29, 2008 terror attack, which left 166 people dead and 244 injured, was carried out by 10 Pakistani terrorists, including Kasab.
- Wheels of justice: eight months to confirm Kasab's death penalty? (Lead) - May 09, 2010
- Kasab to appeal against death sentence in Supreme Court - Feb 23, 2011
- Kasab challenges death penalty in Supreme Court - Jul 29, 2011
- India permits Pak investigators access to 26/11 witnesses - Mar 01, 2011
- High court to decide on Kasab death sentence Feb 21 (Second Lead) - Feb 07, 2011
- Trial court's death penalty verdict flawed: Kasab - Feb 14, 2012
- Kasab may be hanged by year-end, says G K Pillai - May 11, 2010
- Supreme Court stays Kasab's death sentence - Oct 10, 2011
- Kasab death penalty: Expedite process, say lawyers (Three years after 26/11) - Nov 25, 2011
- Kasab claims trial court's death penalty verdict flawed (Lead) - Feb 14, 2012
- Indian court upholds death sentence for Pakistani terrorist involved in 2008 Mumbai bombing - Feb 22, 2011
- 26/11 attacks: Maharashtra Govt. to appeal against Ansari, Sabauddin in SC - Feb 21, 2011
- Kasab death sentence: Mumbai court to decide Feb 21 (Lead) - Feb 07, 2011
- 26/11 case: Bombay High Court dismisses Kasab's juvenile plea - Dec 14, 2010
- Kasab smiled as court upheld his death sentence (Second Lead) - Feb 21, 2011
Tags: 17 years, amir, article 136, bombay high court, convict, death penalties, death penalty, death sentence, death sentences, dhananjay, eight months, gunman, judgements, New Delhi, priority basis, sarda, sessions court, state government, statistical perspective, terror attack