Supreme Court questions Thomas’ credibilityNovember 30th, 2010 - 4:19 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Nov 30 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday expressed reservation on the objectivity of Central Vigilance Commissioner P.J. Thomas if he were to supervise the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the 2G spectrum scam.
The court said that as secretary of the Department of Telecom, Thomas had justified certain actions that are now under the scanner of the CBI.
It would be very difficult for him to be objective if he were to supervise the CBI probe, said the bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly.
The court observation came in the wake of submission by senior counsel K.K. Venugopal that the supervision of the investigation by the CBI could only be done by the statutory authority. Under the statute, the CVC is the supervising authority of the CBI.
The question of supervision by people of independent and impeccable credentials came after the central government informed the court that it had no objection to the court monitoring the investigation by the CBI into 2G spectrum scam.
Venugopal told the court that the supervision of the investigation into the spectrum scam could be done by the Vigilance Commissioner, whose appointment procedure is the same as that of the CVC. Former Karnataka director general of police R. Shree Kumar is the Vigilance Commissioner.
Agreeing on Shree Kumar, senior counsel Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), wondered who will be the second person to supervise the CBI investigation.
Veugopal told the court that there are two Vigilance Commissioners.
- Congress declines to comment on court's remarks on CVC (Lead) - Nov 30, 2010
- Chief Vigilance Commissioner Thomas under scrutiny - Nov 30, 2010
- Apex court to resume hearings in 2G case - Oct 09, 2011
- Government told to deposit Radia tapes with apex court (Second Lead) - Dec 01, 2010
- Government offers apex court to supervise spectrum probe (Lead) - Nov 30, 2010
- CVC Thomas recuses himself from 2G scam - Dec 01, 2010
- Supreme Court to hear plea against CVC Thomas's appointment - Dec 06, 2010
- Chidambaram's role in 2G pricing: Hearing in mid-March (Lead) - Mar 01, 2012
- Supreme Court reserves verdict on CVC's appointment - Feb 11, 2011
- Supreme Court serves notice to CVC Thomas - Dec 06, 2010
- CBI to submit 2G probe reports to CVC: Supreme Court (Second Lead) - Feb 02, 2012
- 2G scam, black money cases in apex court this week - Feb 07, 2011
- Chidambaram allocated extra spectrum to 2G licence holders: Swamy - Apr 20, 2012
- I am continuing as chief vigilance commissioner: Thomas - Dec 01, 2010
- CBI to probe Sadiq Batcha's alleged suicide (Lead) - Apr 01, 2011
Tags: appointment procedure, asok kumar, bhushan, cbi probe, central bureau of investigation, central government, cvc, impeccable credentials, j thomas, karnataka, objectivity, petitioner, public interest litigation, second person, senior counsel, shree, statutory authority, supervising authority, venugopal, vigilance