Supreme Court asks lawyer to file fresh apology
May 3rd, 2011 - 10:15 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, May 3 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday expressed its displeasure over the contents of apology affidavit lawyer R.K. Anand filed, pleading against the enhancement of punishment for his attempt to derail justice in the BMW case.
The court was told that Anand would file a fresh affidavit addressing the issues raised by the judges.
The apex court bench of Justice B. Sudershan Reddy, Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Aftab Alam told senior counsel M.R. Kalla appearing for Anand: “Please ask him (Anand) to read the judgment more carefully before filing the affidavit.”
Anand’s petition challenging his conviction by the Delhi High Court for his alleged attempt to influence controversial witness for the prosecution Sunil Kulkarni in the BMW hit-and-run case was dismissed by the apex court in July 2009.
While dismissing his plea, the apex court issued notice as to why the sentence should not be enhanced.
While Anand’s plea was dismissed, the plea of the special public prosecutor I.U.Khan was upheld by the apex court, giving him benefit of doubt.
Pointing out the contents of the affidavit offering unqualified apology, the court said that the deponent (Anand) was not admitting his guilt but was just saying things “imputed” to him.
The court said that what Anand faced was not just imputations but he has been held guilty.
As Kalla tried to reiterate the content of the affidavit, the court asked him: “Shall we take it, you are not willing to file another affidavit?”
When Kalla referred to earlier instances where the court in similar case had pardoned the petitioner lawyers, the court said in earlier case the contemnors had just spoken against the presiding judges but did not resort to derail the justice delivery system.
At this Kalla said his client has already suffered a lot of humiliation and loss of reputation and pleaded the court to accept the apology.
The court then gave time to Anand to file another affidavit.
- R.K. Anand offers apology - Jan 18, 2011
- Supreme Court offers relief to two Haryana officers - Feb 13, 2011
- Advocate questions plea for contempt action against him - Apr 27, 2010
- Plea on apex court lawyers dismissed (Lead) - Feb 13, 2012
- Apex court convicts senior lawyer R.K. Anand for contempt - Jul 29, 2009
- Supreme Court lifts gag order on Amar Singh tapes (Second Lead) - May 12, 2011
- Rajendra Sethia trial to run on daily basis, rules apex court - May 18, 2012
- I am victim of political cross-fire, Thomas tells apex court (Lead) - Jan 24, 2011
- No apology for remark against Chief Justice Kapadia: Prashant Bhushan (Second Lead) - Jan 13, 2011
- Supreme Court declines plea against Sibal (Lead) - Jul 11, 2011
- 2G: Notice to centre on plea linked to excess spectrum (Lead) - Jan 30, 2012
- Willing to go to jail, won't say sorry: Shanti Bhushan - Nov 10, 2010
- CWG scam: High Court declines bail to Reddy - May 15, 2012
- Land reclaimed after mosque demolition, DDA tells court (Lead) - Jan 14, 2011
- Khalil Chisti's release to take a few days - Apr 09, 2012
Tags: affidavit, aftab, alam, anand, apex, apex court, apology, bmw case, court bench, delhi high court, delivery system, displeasure, humiliation, New Delhi, petitioner, plea, public prosecutor, saying things, senior counsel, witness for the prosecution