Somnath Chatterjee speaks out against judicial activism
December 10th, 2009 - 10:05 pm ICT by IANS ( Leave a comment )
Kolkata, Dec 10 (IANS) Former Lok Sabha speaker Somnath Chatterjee has said the lines demarcating the jurisdiction of different organs of the state have got blurred due to “judicial activism”, and added that none of the arms should go beyond the role assigned to it by the constitution.
He said the framers of the constitution had given the mandate to the judiciary to interpret the laws, but not lay down general norms of behaviour for the government or to decide upon public policy.
“The concept is ‘judicial review’ and not ‘judicial activism’ which is of recent coinage and extends much beyond review,” Chatterjee said.
“It is obvious that all organs of the state should act only according to the constitutional mandate and should not be astute to find any undisclosed source of power or authority to expand its own jurisdiction, which will give rise to avoidable conflicts and affect the harmonious functioning of the different organs of there state,” the noted barrister said while speaking on “The concept of separation of powers, under the constitution of India”.
“However, for some years now, it is being noticed that the lines demarcating the jurisdiction of the different organs of the state have got blurred, as a section of the judiciary seems to be of the view that it has the authority by way of what is described as ‘judicial activism’ to exercise powers, which are earmarked by the constitution for the legislative or executive branches,” he said.
Delivering the Justice K.M. Yusuf Memorial Lecture 2009, Chatterjee said there were umpteen recent instances where the judiciary has intervened in matters entirely within the domain of the executive, including policy decisions.
He contended that in a democracy the executive authority is accountable to the people for its every action or inaction.
- Constitutional powers should not be exceeded: Manmohan Singh - May 08, 2010
- Judges shouldn't shy away from criticism: Kapadia - Oct 19, 2011
- Judiciary needs 'more accountability', 'restraint' in activism (Lead) - Apr 24, 2011
- Do not encroach upon others' domain, Kapadia cautions judges (Lead) - Nov 26, 2011
- Jaitley seeks new commission to appoint judges - Aug 19, 2011
- Image of independent judiciary necessary for Pakistan, says Pakistan's Chief Justice - Feb 06, 2011
- Canal water allocation not in judicial domain: Apex court - Jul 25, 2011
- Make litigation affordable, reduce pending cases: PM (Second Lead) - May 08, 2010
- President seeks review of figures on pending court cases (Lead) - Jul 31, 2010
- Jaitley favours conditional inclusion of PM in Lokpal bill - Jul 05, 2011
- Judiciary must appreciate practical difficulties: Khurshid - Jul 13, 2011
- Review amendment on judges' appointment, says Pakistani apex court - Oct 21, 2010
- Dictators not coming back: Gilani - Jan 20, 2012
- Pakistan's dynamic instability: Road to real democracy? (Comment) - Jan 29, 2012
- Mukherjee seeks views on Lokpal bill; government says talks on right path (Lead) - May 31, 2011
Tags: barrister, coinage, constitution of india, constitutional mandate, executive authority, executive branches, framers of the constitution, inaction, judicial activism, judicial review, judiciary, Lok Sabha, m yusuf, memorial lecture, norms, organs, policy decisions, separation of powers, somnath chatterjee, undisclosed source