SC to re-examine verdict on membership of banned outfitsAugust 13th, 2012 - 11:53 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Aug 13 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday said that it would take a relook at its earlier judgment which said that mere membership of a banned organisation was not a crime.
The apex court bench of Justice Deepak Verma and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra agreed to examine the government plea seeking the recall of its Feb 4, 2011, order holding that mere membership of a banned organisation was not an offence.
The plea for the recall of the order passed by the apex court bench of Justice Markandey Katju (since retired) and Justice Gyan Sudha Misra was made by the Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran.
The apex court by its order had said that the Section 3(5) of the now-repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act could not be read literally, as it would violate Articles 19 and 21 of the constitution.
“Hence, mere membership of a banned organisation will not make a person a criminal unless he resorts to violence or incites people to violence or creates public disorder by violence or incitement to violence,” the court said.
The court said this while setting aside the order passed in a TADA case March 28, 2007, by the designated court in Guwahati in Assam.
Petitioner Arup Bhuyan was alleged to be a member of the outlawed United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA). Bhuyan was convicted under the TADA which made mere membership of a banned organisation a criminal act.
While setting aside the TADA court’s order, the apex court’s Feb 4, 2011 order said: “Even assuming he was a member of the ULFA it has not been proved that he was an active member and not a mere passive member.”
- Confession statement to police is weak evidence: Apex court - Feb 04, 2011
- BJP's J. Shantha allowed to vote in presidential poll - Jul 12, 2012
- Apex court to hear plea on abducted Odisha legislator - Apr 18, 2012
- Apex court to hear plea against SPOs' disbanding Sep 22 - Sep 09, 2011
- Not encouraging the sex trade, says SC - Jul 27, 2012
- Apex court issues notice to IMA over doctors' strike - Jun 25, 2012
- SC split verdict on Madani's bail plea in Bangalore blast case - May 04, 2011
- Apex court to hear Lalit Modi's plea Oct 20 - Sep 23, 2010
- Supreme Court not to interfere in CWG probe - Sep 16, 2011
- SC pulls up Odisha on lawyer's absence - Jul 31, 2012
- Use discretion to further ends of justice: Apex court - Nov 07, 2011
- Work out a compromise, apex court tells BCCI and Modi - Oct 21, 2010
- As judges differ, Maudany's bail plea is sent to chief justice (Lead) - May 04, 2011
- Supreme Court relief for Krishna - Jan 27, 2012
- Apex court orders funds for panel on sex workers (Lead) - Aug 02, 2011
Tags: active member, apex court, arup, assam, court bench, criminal act, deepak verma, disruptive activities, guwahati, gyan, incitement, misra, mohan, petitioner, prevention act, relook, solicitor general, sudha, tada court, united liberation front