Sanction provision in graft cases misused: Apex court
November 23rd, 2010 - 10:49 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Nov 23 (IANS) The instrument of sanction which was treated as a “shield” against vexatious complaints has now become a “sword” to defeat the legal provisions on punishing corrupt pubic servants, the Supreme Court said Tuesday.
The court said this while asking the government to place before it the number of cases pending with it for sanction to prosecute public servants in corruption matters.
The apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly told Attorney General Goolam Vahanvati to also give the duration for which the cases seeking sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) had been pending with the government.
The court’s observation came during the hearing on a petition by former MP Subramanian Swamy.
Swamy challenged a Delhi High Court order declining to direct Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to accord sanction on his letter seeking to prosecute the then telecom minister A. Raja in the scandal involving spectrum allocation to mobile companies in 2008.
The apex court said the details on pending cases after Vahanvati told the court that the sanctioning authority under the PCA should not take more than six months in deciding on an application seeking sanction to prosecute a public servant.
The attorney general described the time limit of six months as “reasonable” while addressing the apex court’s concern whether the authority could sit indefinitely on the prima facie findings of the competent court that there was a fit case for the prosecution of a public servant.
On the question of delay in according sanction, the court observed: “Judicial time is scarce. The court can not direct the sanctioning authority to grant sanction”.
The court observed that there were numerous instances where decisions were not taken for several years. This included matters related to giving compensation for land acquisition and grant of compensation to workers under labour laws.
- Supreme Court reserves order on Swamy's plea (Lead) - Nov 24, 2010
- PM not obliged to sanction Raja prosecution: Attorney General (Night Lead) - Nov 23, 2010
- Apex court suggests changes in corruption law - Jan 31, 2012
- PM not obliged to sanction Raja prosecution: Attorney General (Lead) - Nov 23, 2010
- Prosecuting corrupt officials: court sets deadline for government (Lead) - Jan 31, 2012
- PMO rapped on Swamy plea, government gets prosecution deadline (Roundup) - Jan 31, 2012
- Review sought of ruling on public servant's prosecution (Lead) - Mar 02, 2012
- Chidambaram welcomes Supreme Court verdict - Jan 31, 2012
- Supreme Court reserves order on Swamy petition - Nov 24, 2010
- 2G scam: Supreme Court reserves verdict on Swamy's plea to prosecute Raja - Nov 24, 2010
- PM not obliged to sanction Raja prosecution: Vahanvati to court - Nov 23, 2010
- Apex court verdict vindicates PM, says PMO - Jan 31, 2012
- 2G: Apex court to hear government's plea April 13 - Apr 05, 2012
- Prosecuting corrupt officials: court sets deadline for government - Jan 31, 2012
- Verdict will help win war on corruption: Swamy - Jan 31, 2012
Tags: apex court, competent court, court bench, delhi high court, ganguly, labour laws, land acquisition, legal provisions, manmohan, manmohan singh, mobile companies, pca, prevention of corruption act, prime minister manmohan, prime minister manmohan singh, public servant, public servants, sanction, spectrum allocation, subramanian swamy