Relief for canal-affected and dam-displaced not same: Apex court (Lead)
August 2nd, 2011 - 10:27 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Aug 2 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday said people in Madhya Pradesh affected by the canal network of the Indira Sagar and Omkareshwar dams were not entitled to the same rehabilitation package as given to those displaced by the submergence caused by the dams constructed on the Narmada.
The people whose lands had been acquired for the canal network may, however, be accommodated and given a good compensation at market prices, said an apex court bench of Justice J.M. Panchal, Justice Deepak Verma and Justice B.S. Chauhan.
The bench set aside the Nov 11, 2009 verdict of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that asked the state government to pay the same relief package to the people affected by the laying of the canal network of the Indira Sagar and Omkareshwar projects as was given to those displaced by the submergence caused by the Narmada valley dams.
The Indira Sagar Dam was completed in 2005 and the Omkareshwar Dam was completed in 2007.
The high court also restrained the state government from acquiring lands for the canal network of India Sagar and Omkareshwar projects till an approval by the environment and forests ministry.
This part of the high court’s direction was stayed by the apex court Feb 25, 2010, permitting excavation, construction and acquisition of lands.
Justice Chauhan said: “It was not permissible for the high court to take a view contrary to the view taken by this court, particularly, when the high court came to the conclusion that there was a reasonable differential between the two.”
“This court has taken a view that the canal-affected persons cannot be put at par with the submergence-affected persons,” the judgment said.
- Package for canal-hit and dam displaced not same, rules court - Aug 02, 2011
- Court relief for Madhya Pradesh farmers - May 05, 2010
- Apex court rejects plea for dam oustees' relief - Jul 27, 2011
- Supreme Court refuses to revoke stay on Narmada canals projects - Dec 18, 2009
- Madhya Pradesh allowed to resume work on dam projects - Feb 25, 2010
- Centre misleading court on canal projects: Madhya Pradesh - Feb 17, 2010
- Apex court suspends order on relief to Narmada dam displaced - Nov 20, 2009
- Centre gets more time to file affidavit on Narmada canal project - Feb 04, 2010
- Maheshwar Dam oustees on indefinite hunger strike - Apr 22, 2010
- Canal water allocation not in judicial domain: Apex court - Jul 25, 2011
- Can rely on evidence given by child: Apex court - Mar 21, 2011
- Noida land acquisition row: SC notice to UP, Noida - Apr 27, 2012
- Orissa, Chhattisgarh questioned on dam panel's report - Jul 20, 2011
- High court quashes Greater Noida land acquisition (Lead) - Jul 19, 2011
- Supreme Court stays Babri Masjid-Ramjanmbhoomi verdict (Lead) - May 09, 2011
Tags: apex, apex court, aug 2, canal network, contrary, court bench, dams, deepak verma, differential, excavation construction, forests, indira sagar dam, judgment, narmada valley, New Delhi, omkareshwar, panchal, sagar, state government, submergence