Provident Fund case to remain in Uttar Pradesh
November 19th, 2010 - 8:59 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Nov 19 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday declined a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) plea seeking the transfer of trial in the Provident Fund case from Ghaziabad to outside Uttar Pradesh.
The investigating agency wanted the trial transferred to Delhi on the grounds that many of the accused judges were colleagues of the trial court judge.
The apex court bench of Justice D.K. Jain, Justice V.S. Sirpurkar and
Justice G.S. Singhvi said that even if the accused judges were former colleagues of the judge presiding over the Special CBI court, it could not accept the premise that trial would not be impartial.
While asking the trial court to conduct the proceedings expeditiously, the judgment said the CBI’s grievance in seeking the transfer of trial was misplaced.
During the earlier hearing of the case Oct 28, Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati told the court that the Provident Fund scam was the first of its kind and had shaken the confidence of the public in judiciary.
He said the judge going to hold the trial had either already worked with or under the accused or was likely to work with them in future.
“The paramount principle to meet the ends of justice is that justice should not only be done but must appear to have been done,” Vahanvati had argued.
The CBI has named 24 judicial officers in the Provident Fund case. Three of them are Allahabad High Court judges.
- Supreme Court reserves verdict in Ghaziabad courts' scam (Lead) - Oct 28, 2010
- Supreme Court rejects CBI plea to transfer UP PF scam trial to Delhi - Nov 19, 2010
- Ghaziabad judge denies trying to hamper CBI in PF scam - Sep 08, 2010
- Apex court notice to judge over provident fund scam trial - Aug 04, 2010
- Court dismisses plea in Mulayam assets case - Mar 03, 2012
- Apex court stays Ghaziabad provident fund scam trial (Lead) - Jul 28, 2010
- Court dismisses plea in Mulayam assets case (Lead) - Mar 03, 2012
- Government reluctant on U. Lalit's appointment in 2G case (Lead) - Apr 05, 2011
- Apex court reserves verdict in Ghaziabad courts' scam - Oct 28, 2010
- CBI shielding Chidambaram, petitioner tells apex court - Sep 28, 2011
- 2G: Supreme Court to hear Essar Tech's plea Feb 17 (Lead) - Feb 09, 2012
- New apex court bench to hear 2G case (Lead) - Mar 16, 2012
- Apex court reserves order on Chidambaram in 2G case - Apr 24, 2012
- Apex court declines to transfer provident fund scam trial to Delhi - Nov 12, 2009
- Supreme Court rejects Kanimozhi's bail plea (Lead) - Jun 20, 2011
Tags: apex, apex court, cbi court, central bureau of investigation, court bench, former colleagues, ghaziabad, grievance, high court judges, investigating agency, jain, judgment, judicial officers, judiciary, New Delhi, plea, premise, provident fund, trial court judge, uttar pradesh