PIL against Rathore, seeks abetment to suicide charge
December 29th, 2009 - 2:06 pm ICT by IANSChandigarh, Dec 29 (IANS) A public interest litigation (PIL) was Tuesday filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking a “fresh case” against disgraced former Haryana director general of police (DGP) S.P.S. Rathore and asking that he be tried for abetment to suicide of a minor as well.
Senior lawyer and human rights activist Ranjan Lakhanpal, who filed the PIL, said that a fresh case was being sought against Rathore under Section 305 of the Indian Penal Code (abetment of suicide of a minor) as Ruchika Girhotra, whom he was accused of sexually molesting, was a minor when the incident happened.
The matter is likely to be taken up by the high court Jan 6 when it reopens after vacations.
“I have filed the PIL. The hearing will take place on Jan 6. We have sought a fresh case against Rathore under Section 305 of IPC,” Lakhanpal told IANS.
Section 305 has harsher punishment, including death penalty or life imprisonment, if the offender abets the suicide of a minor or insane person.
Earlier, lawyers and investigating agencies had sought Section 306 (abetment of suicide) against Rathore.
Ruchika, a budding tennis player, was molested by Rathore Aug 12, 1990 in Panchkula town in Haryana, 10 km from here, and had committed suicide three years later by consuming poison Dec 28. She died the next day.
Incidentally, the PIL has been filed on the 16th death anniversary of Ruchika falling Tuesday. A memorial march was taken out by Ruchika’s friend Aradhana, whose family fought her case against Rathore for 19 years. They marched to the house where Ruchika once lived in Sector 6 of Panchkula and committed suicide.
In the PIL, Lakhanpal also sought strict action against the management of the Sacred Heart School in Sector 26 for expelling Ruchika on illogical grounds.
A special CBI court in Chandigarh had held Rathore guilty last week for molesting Ruchika in Panchkula town Aug 12, 1990 and sentenced him to a six-month prison term. However, Rathore was immediately released on bail.
In the petition Lakhanpal has also sought appropriate action against all those officials who favoured Rathore and delayed the trial for 19 years.
“I have appealed to the high court to register a case against Rathore for implicating Ashu (Ruchika’s brother) in 11 cases of theft and illegally detaining him and torturing him for two months,” said Lakhanpal.
- Ruchika case: Punjab and Haryana High Court seeks details of Rathore's promotion - Nov 17, 2010
- On Ruchika's 16th death anniversary, government says case to be re-probed (Roundup) - Dec 29, 2009
- Haryana fails to file reply in Ruchika case, court upset - Jan 27, 2010
- Decision on Rathore's bail plea reserved (Lead) - Jan 07, 2010
- Lawyer to file PIL in Ruchika's case Tuesday - Dec 28, 2009
- Complainant opposes Rathore's bail, seeks judicial probe - Nov 11, 2010
- Ruchika case: High Court grants interim bail to Rathore - Jan 25, 2010
- Ruchika case: High Court to hear Rathore's bail plea - Jan 18, 2010
- Submit probe report in Rathore case, court tells CBI - Nov 17, 2010
- Ruchika case: Rathore's bail plea extended till January 25 - Jan 18, 2010
- Rathore gets interim relief, asked not to leave country (Fourth Lead) - Jan 01, 2010
- Court gives Rathore interim relief on bail plea (Third Lead) - Jan 01, 2010
- Ruchika case: CBI to meet Ruchika's father - Jan 15, 2010
- Ruchika case: CBI to question Rathore - Jan 22, 2010
- Ruchika case: High Court to hear Rathore's bail petition - Jan 25, 2010
Tags: 19 years, aradhana, cbi court, death anniversary, death penalty, dgp, director general, indian penal code, insane person, lakhanpal, life imprisonment, pil, prison term, public interest litigation, punjab and haryana high court, ranjan, rathore, sacred heart school, strict action, tennis player