Opposing bail, CBI says Rathore can still tamper evidence
January 18th, 2010 - 3:57 pm ICT by IANSChandigarh, Jan 18 (IANS) The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Monday strongly opposed the anticipatory bail sought by disgraced former Haryana police chief S.P.S. Rathore in connection with two fresh police complaints against him.
CBI submitted its reply in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Rathore, convicted for molesting teenager Ruchika Girhotra, had moved the high court seeking anticipatory bail after a district court of Panchkula town in Haryana had dismissed it Jan 8.
But the CBI counsel in its reply submitted in court said: “The rejection of anticipatory bail by a Panchkula court is proper and based on sound reasoning because there is a possibility of tampering of evidence and intimidating the witnesses as Rathore had held high positions in the state.”
Two new First Information Reports (FIRs) were registered against Rathore Dec 29 in connection with the Ruchika Girhotra molestation case. He was booked on charges like attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, forging evidence, wrongful confinement, fabricating false evidence and criminal conspiracy.
“We have strongly opposed any kind of relief on the arrest of Rathore as he can still use his connections to tamper evidence,” Anmol Rattan Sidhu, CBI counsel, told IANS.
“Our team is collecting the evidence. We are not at all biased in this case and our aim is to ensure right justice for both parties,” said Sidhu.
In a third FIR Jan 5, Rathore was also charged with abetting the suicide (Section 306) of teenaged molestation victim Ruchika.
Justice Sabina told the CBI Monday to file their reply in the third FIR and the next hearing of the court is slated Jan 25.
“The 30-member team of CBI is here for the last six days but so far they have not found any substantial evidence against Rathore. They are just reproducing the FIRs registered against Rathore,” Abha Rathore, his wife and counsel, argued in court.
But the CBI reply said: “CBI’s investigation is at the initial stage and Rathore can misuse his official position now also. Grant of anticipatory bail at this stage would not be in the interest of justice as it could intervene in the smooth investigation of the agency.”
A CBI special court here Dec 21 held Rathore guilty of molesting 14-year-old Ruchika in Panchkula town Aug 12, 1990 and sentenced him to a six-month prison term. Rathore was immediately granted bail.
The budding tennis player had committed suicide three years after the incident.
- Rathore gets interim bail in Ruchika case (Lead) - Jan 25, 2010
- High court to take up Rathore's bail plea Tuesday - Jan 11, 2010
- Rathore's bail plea hearing adjourned till July 19 - Apr 05, 2010
- Complainant opposes Rathore's bail, seeks judicial probe - Nov 11, 2010
- Rathore's bail plea hearing adjourned to April 5 - Feb 15, 2010
- Rathore's bail plea rejected, arrest possible any time (Lead) - Jan 08, 2010
- Court terms Rathore's crimes 'spine-chilling', rejects bail plea (Second Lead) - Jan 09, 2010
- High court denies Rathore interim bail - Jan 12, 2010
- Rathore walks out of jail, smiling - Nov 12, 2010
- Hearing on fresh cases against Rathore adjourned till Aug 9 - Jul 19, 2010
- Ruchika case: Punjab and Haryana High Court seeks details of Rathore's promotion - Nov 17, 2010
- Decision on Rathore's bail plea reserved (Lead) - Jan 07, 2010
- Rathore's anticipatory bail plea dismissed - Jan 08, 2010
- Rathore charged with abetting suicide, arrest imminent (Lead) - Jan 05, 2010
- Ruchika case: High Court to hear Rathore's bail plea - Jan 18, 2010
Tags: abha, cbi, central bureau of investigation, criminal conspiracy, criminal intimidation, false evidence, fir, haryana police, information reports, member team, molestation victim, police complaints, punjab and haryana high court, rattan, sabina, sidhu, six days, sound reasoning, substantial evidence, suicide section