Notice issued over nursery admission guidelines
December 17th, 2010 - 9:19 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Dec 17 (IANS) The Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) Friday issued notice to the Delhi government over the nursery admission guidelines, saying they were violative of the provisions of the Right to Education (RTE) Act. “The commission issued notice to the principal secretary, education, Delhi government to re-examine the order on top priority since prima-facie the said order is violative of the RTE Act,” a DCPCR statement said. The guidelines were issued Thursday.
“The guidelines issued by the human resource development ministry and the Delhi government are in conformity with the RTE Act in so far as they apply random selection criteria to 25 percent seats for children from economically weaker section.
“However, the order of the Directorate of Education (DoE) clearly violates the provisions of RTE wherein it deals with remaining 75 per cent seats in respect of un-aided and specified category schools,” a DCPCR official said.
“As regard to liberty given to schools to formulate their admission policy, the commission is of the view that this liberty would be tantamount to the government not having any control over the admission policies of the schools as there is no mention of the date by which they are supposed to submit the policy to the DoE,” the official added.
The nursery admission guidelines state that schools will be free to formulate their policy for admission for 75 percent of the seats but it should include criteria for categorisation of the applicants.
“The schools will be free to base their criteria like sibling, alumni, single parent, transfer case or neighbourhood.
“They will be asked to formulate their plan and submit it to the education department. The schools should consider that categorisation should be rational, reasonable and just,” Delhi Education Minister Arvinder Singh Lovely told reporters Thursday.
The DCPCR official said: “The categorisation of the applicants is nothing but introduction of the so called point system. Having dealt with a large number of cases of denial of admissions to the children, the commission has found that the point system is highly discriminatory, both prior and subsequent to the enforcement of RTE Act.”
The notice said: “Multiple criteria have been introduced for school admissions which would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other category of children which would be clear violation of provisions of RTE Act”.
The commission has asked for a report on the same by Dec 27.
- Over 10,000 violations of Right to Education in Delhi - Dec 21, 2010
- Release nursery admission guidelines, Delhi government told - Nov 22, 2010
- Nearly 12,000 Right to Education violations in Delhi - Mar 27, 2011
- Delhi schools free to formulate nursery admissions criteria (Lead) - Dec 15, 2010
- Delhi schools asked to furnish admission process details - Nov 25, 2010
- Delhi schools to set nursery admission criteria, parents jittery (Second lead) - Dec 15, 2010
- Why unsafe Delhi schools not demolished, asks rights body - Dec 30, 2010
- School admission procedure should be rational, transparent - Nov 26, 2010
- Fill vacant seats for poor students in summer vacations: Court - Apr 20, 2012
- Parents await Delhi's new nursery admission system - Dec 14, 2010
- Delhi child rights panel to set up RTE cell - Apr 08, 2010
- Court notice to Delhi government on pre-school admissions - Nov 02, 2011
- Mixed response to quota in nursery admissions - Feb 11, 2011
- Court notice to Kendriya Vidyalayas on admitting poor students - Feb 09, 2012
- Government welcomes education act verdict, schools not too happy - Apr 12, 2012
Tags: admission guidelines, admission policies, admission policy, conformity, delhi commission, delhi government, development ministry, directorate of education, education department, education doe, education minister, human resource development, principal secretary, random selection, rte, selection criteria, sibling, single parent, top priority, transfer case