No civil-military confrontation: Antony on age row
January 31st, 2012 - 2:49 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Jan 31 (IANS) Downplaying the controversy over army chief Gen V.K. Singh’s age, Defence Minister A.K. Antony Tuesday said the issue should not be seen as a civil-military confrontation and the Supreme Court order on the issue should be awaited.
It was not the government but two branches of the army that had maintained two different dates of the army chief’s birth for 36 years, the minister said.
“The long pending controversy will end after the Supreme Court order. I agree it is unfortunate. It’s not a question of civil-military controversy. It happened unfortunately, maybe without any motive, but for 36 years the army maintained two dates of birth… that is why this controversy occurred,” Antony said on the sidelines of an awards function.
“Two branches of army maintained two different dates of births and nobody noticed it for 36 years. For the first time in 2006 it came to notice and the then army chief took a decision and told the government. Again in 2008, the then army general gave another recommendation and government accepted it,” he said.
Antony said the government only accepted what the then army chiefs recommend during different years and thought that the controversy was over and data amended accordingly.
“We thought it is over but again complaint came to the government last year. Then government took a decision referring it to law ministry and attorney general thrice … that is the only way government can function,” he said.
Replying to the question on army chief approaching the apex court, Antony said: “The government’s decision is not final and it is democracy and anybody can question government’s decision and anybody can approach that the court.”
“The issue has now gone beyond the government and whatever Supreme Court decides will be final. All should be mentally prepared to accept the decision,” he added.
The age controversy stems from two sets of age records of Gen. Singh with the Adjutant General’s and Military Secretary’s branches of the Indian Army. While the Adjutant General’s branch, the official record keeper and responsible for pay and pensions, has 1951 as the year of birth, the Military Secretary’s branch, which deals with postings and promotions, has 1950 as his year of birth.
- Antony blames army for chief's age row (Lead) - Jan 31, 2012
- Antony, V.K. Singh blame army for age row (Roundup) - Jan 31, 2012
- Government to settle army chief age issue in court, not administratively - Jan 29, 2012
- Government reiterates order on Army chief's age issue, to settle case in court (Lead) - Jan 29, 2012
- Army chief's plea to change age rejected, to retire in May 2012 (Lead) - Dec 30, 2011
- No clue when age row will end: Army chief - Jan 15, 2012
- Amidst age row, Indian Army chief meets key aides - Jan 02, 2012
- Army rejects defence ministry's order on chief's age - Aug 23, 2011
- Army chief's age plea before Supreme Court Friday - Feb 09, 2012
- 1950 or 1951? That's the vital question for Gen. V.K. Singh - Feb 09, 2012
- It's official: 1950 is army chief's year of birth (Timeline) - Feb 10, 2012
- Apex court questions process on army chief's age row (Second Lead) - Feb 03, 2012
- Indian Army denies chief's 'Pakistan army chief' remarks - Jan 03, 2012
- Ministry rejection of chief's age plea legally unsound: Army - Sep 04, 2011
- Army chief meets Mukherjee amid age row - Feb 02, 2012
Tags: antony, apex, apex court, army chief, army chiefs, army general, attorney general, births, branches of the army, controversy, dates of birth, defence minister, democracy, hellip, law ministry, military confrontation, motive, New Delhi, sidelines, supreme court