Nine DU college principals fined for flouting RTI
November 28th, 2009 - 6:41 pm ICT by IANS ( Leave a comment )New Delhi, Nov 28 (IANS) Principals of nine Delhi University (DU) colleges have been fined Rs.5,000 each for not complying with the Right To Information (RTI) Act rule of placing information about their college in the public domain.
The Central Information Commission (CIC) acted against the principals for not following Section 4 of the RTI Act, which mandates suo moto disclosure by public institutions regarding budget, rules, expenditure and name of its Public Information Officer among other things.
The CIC moved following a complaint from Rajeev Lala.
The colleges whose principals have been fined are Sri Aurobindo College, Aditi Mahavidyalaya, Bharti College, Mata Sundari College for Women, Swami Shraddhanand College, Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies, Ram Lal Anand College, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur College of Nursing and Amar Jyoti Rehabilitation and Research Centre. The DU has over 80 colleges.
The CIC has directed that the fine money be recovered from the principals’ salaries before Dec 10.
Lala in his complaint stated that he visited the website of these colleges and found they had not displayed the information as required by Section 4 of the RTI Act.
On June 7, Shailesh Gandhi, an information commissioner at the CIC, along with DU Vice Chancellor Deepak Pental had urged all colleges to ensure that they comply with Section 4 by Aug 15.
The commission sent reminders to the colleges warning that it would be forced to act if the order was not implemented.
The CIC held a hearing Nov 24 where it asked the college principals to appear with written submissions on “why penalty should not be imposed on them for refusing to meet their legal obligations under the act”.
Some promised to follow the requirement within three months and some within a day. Some principals expressed regret.
The commission said that even four years after the RTI Act was passed, legal requirements under it have still not been met by the colleges.
“In spite of repeated reminders the college does not appear to be willing to meet the Section 4 requirements of the act,” Gandhi noted in his order for each college. “The commission finds this as a fit case for penalty.”
- Is CIC empowered to prosecute for perjury? Court issues notice - Dec 23, 2011
- Apex court restores powers of transparency panel chief - Oct 18, 2010
- Now, RTI complaint hearings through video conferencing (Lead) - Jul 28, 2011
- Court stays transparency panel's order against CBI - Jul 28, 2011
- 'Penalty imposed for denial of information unjustified' - Dec 17, 2010
- Now, RTI complaint hearings through video conferencing - Jul 28, 2011
- Court stays information panel's order to RBI on RTI plea - Dec 09, 2011
- Computerise all offices, CIC advises RBI - Apr 19, 2010
- Ex-judge moves high court over complaint against him - Feb 01, 2011
- Over 15,000 RTI appeals pending with information commission - Feb 24, 2011
- More transparency can bring down RTI pleas: Apex court - Aug 16, 2011
- Delhi to put details of legislators' development fund online - Sep 04, 2009
- Will strive to make RTI more effective, accessible: New CIC - Oct 10, 2010
- Seven complaints from RTI users, says government - Aug 11, 2010
- In 34 years no prosecution in bonded labour cases - May 17, 2011
Tags: aditi, amrit, budget rules, cic, delhi university, information commission, information commissioner, jyoti, legal obligations, pental, public information officer, public institutions, rajkumari amrit kaur, ram lal anand college, rti act, shailesh gandhi, sri aurobindo, sri aurobindo college, sukhdev college of business studies, vice chancellor