NGO files plea before Gujarat riots commission
May 14th, 2010 - 11:09 pm ICT by IANS ( 1 comment )
Gandhinagar, May 14 (IANS) Activist Teesta Setalvad of Mumbai-based NGO Citizens for Justice and Peace Friday filed an affidavit before the G.T. Nanavati-Akshay Mehta judicial enquiry commission providing details of the locations of some important mobile phone numbers during the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat.
She said the locations of these mobile numbers were clinching evidence of their movements during these crucial days and of the complicity of the state government in the post-Godhra communal riots.
These numbers were held by the officials of the chief minister’s office, senior ministers in the then Narendra Modi cabinet, senior bureaucrats and police officers as well as some Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal leaders.
Teesta claimed that there were 15 phone calls from the chief minister’s office to the then Ahmedabad police commissioner P.C. Pande on the morning of Feb 28, 2002.
“Despite this, the police commissioner did not stir out of his office which led to the conclusion that there were instructions from the top to the police not to act.”
She also submitted analysis of the locational details of key ministers, bureaucrats and police officers, and VHP leaders to conclude that when the communal riots broke out most of these functionaries were in the vicinity of Naroda or Gulbarg Society in Ahmedabad, which reported major casualties during the rioting.
Those whose call records figure include the then minister of state for home Gordhan Jhadaphia, the then heath minister Ashok Bhatt, the then home secretary Ashok Narayan, the then state director general of police K. Chakravarthi, other key police officers, MLA Mayaben Kodnani, and the then VHP state general secretary Jaideep Patel — both later held as accused in the Naroda-Patiya and Naroda Gaam massacres — and Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi, also an accused.
Setalvad’s affidavit, however, mostly contained the same details that the Jansangharsh Manch, which is representing the riot victims before the Nanavati-Mehta commission, has already submitted to the commission over three years ago.
It was mainly on this basis that the Manch wanted Chief Minister Narendra Modi and some others to be summoned before the panel for cross-examination.
The commission, however, did not oblige the Manch which, in turn, approached the high court where the matter rests. The commission has informed the high court that it is yet to take a final decision on summoning Modi.
- Godhra panel to complete report in 3-4 months - Feb 15, 2010
- Gujarat riots: Panel asked to seek details from ex-officials - Aug 26, 2010
- Riot panel witness testifies against Teesta Setalvad - Nov 24, 2010
- Questioning of ex-officials on Gujarat riots put off - Aug 10, 2011
- Modi's aides file affidavits before Godhra probe panel - Feb 06, 2010
- Gujarat cop's Facebook posts figure in riots panel hearing - Jun 27, 2011
- Nanavati-Mehta panel allows cross-examination of Sanjiv Bhatt - May 09, 2011
- Clarify stand on summoning Modi, court asks panel - Mar 22, 2010
- Top bureaucrats depose before Nanavaty panel - Aug 30, 2011
- Plea to quiz Modi over riots to come up April 22 - Mar 21, 2011
- Former Gujarat minister Jhadapia grilled fifth time - Oct 22, 2010
- Godhra probe panel summons Sanjiv Bhatt - Apr 27, 2011
- Teesta denies fabricating riot victims' affidavits - Nov 25, 2010
- Gujarat riots: Panel's refusal to quiz ex-minister to be challenged - Oct 04, 2010
- Nanavati panel again asked to summon Modi - Aug 13, 2010
Tags: akshay, ashok, babu, bajrang dal, chief minister, communal riots, gandhinagar, home secretary, jaideep, judicial enquiry, justice and peace, mobile numbers, mobile phone numbers, nanavati, pande, patiya, police commissioner, riots in gujarat, state director, vishwa hindu parishad
May 15th, 2010 at 6:26 am
I don’t understand that how those 15 phone calls work as any proof for or against Modi. You don’t even know who actually answered the call and what was discussed on these calls. It sounds very presumptious of Ms Setalvad to claim that those phone calls indicate instructions to abet riots.