Lanka ‘war crimes’: India cautious, trying for a forward-looking outcomeMarch 14th, 2012 - 4:32 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, March 14 (IANS) Treading cautiously on the the US-backed resolution on alleged war crimes during Sri Lanka’s civil war, External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna said Wednesday the government was engaged with all parties to achieve “a forward-looking outcome that is based on reconciliation rather than confrontation”.
“I would like to highlight here that on such sensitive issues we will need to consider the implications of our actions carefully. Any assertions on our part may have implications on our historically friendly relations with a neighbouring country,” Krishna said in the Rajya Sabha in a statement on “The Situation in Sri Lanka”
“We would also need to examine whether our actions will actually assist in the process of reconciliation in Sri Lanka, and enhance the current dialogue between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil parties, including the Tamil National Alliance,” he said.
Commenting on the draft resolution on Sri Lanka in the UN Human Rights Council, Krishna said: “We are engaged with all parties in an effort to achieve a forward looking outcome that is based on reconciliation and accountability rather than deepening confrontation and mistrust between the concerned parties.”
“I may mention that the issue of human rights allegations against Sri Lanka is yet to come up for formal discussion at the 19th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva,” he said.
“A view on this issue will be taken as and when the time is finalised for consideration of the draft resolution on Sri Lanka in the UN Human Rights Council,” he added.
Krishna also stressed that India has conveyed to the Sri Lankan government the importance of a genuine process of reconciliation to address the grievances of the Tamil community.
Krishna’s statement came a day after the allegations of “war crimes” during Colombo’s civil war with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) triggered a massive uproar in parliament, with two key Tamil Nadu parties — DMK and AIADMK — asking the Indian government to vote against Sri Lanka on the resolution. AIADMK members walked out of the house after Krishna’s statement as a sign of protest.
The DMK members stressed that the government should unequivocally support the US-backed resolution on Sri Lanka.
- India non-committal on 'war crimes', studying 'sentiments'(Lead) - Mar 14, 2012
- India non-committal on Sri Lanka 'war crimes' (Roundup) - Mar 14, 2012
- Uproar in parliament over Sri Lanka's 'war crimes' (Third Lead) - Mar 13, 2012
- Lanka resolution: Uproar in parliament, India undecided (Roundup) - Mar 13, 2012
- Amid pressure, PM says India inclined to vote against Sri Lanka (Roundup) - Mar 19, 2012
- India inclined to vote against Sri Lanka: PM (Second Lead) - Mar 19, 2012
- India may vote against Sri Lanka (Lead) - Mar 19, 2012
- DMK calls meeting on Sri Lanka resolution - Mar 17, 2012
- Rajya Sabha adjourned over Sri Lanka `war crimes' (Second Lead) - Mar 13, 2012
- Uproar in Rajya Sabha over Sri Lankan 'war crimes' (Lead) - Mar 13, 2012
- Don't support Sri Lanka at UNHCR, say Tamil parties - Feb 29, 2012
- Sri Lanka urges India to review Geneva stand (Roundup) - Mar 20, 2012
- 'India hoping for forward-looking outcome on Sri Lanka resolution' - Mar 13, 2012
- Karunanidhi warns Centre over UN resolution - Mar 15, 2012
- 'Misquoted' Sri Lankan envoy apologises to Indian MPs (Lead) - Mar 15, 2012
Tags: draft resolution, external affairs minister, government of sri lanka, grievances, human rights allegations, krishna, liberation tigers of tamil eelam, liberation tigers of tamil eelam ltte, mistrust, national alliance, neighbouring country, process of reconciliation, rajya sabha, sensitive issues, sri lankan government, tamil community, tamil parties, un human rights council, uproar, war crimes