Jessica case: Hostile witnesses to now face the heatFebruary 17th, 2011 - 10:29 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Feb 17 (IANS) Witnesses who turned hostile during the trial in the 1999 murder of model Jessica Lal may now be in trouble as the Delhi High Court will from Friday resume perjury (lying on oath) proceedings against them. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, along with some other judge, will take up regular hearing of the case from Feb 18.
The development occurred after Delhi Police earlier submitted in the high court a copy of the April 2010 Supreme Court verdict upholding the conviction of prime accused Manu Sharma for the murder.
Seeking resumption of perjury (lying on oath) case against the witnesses, who include actor Shyan Munshi, ballistic experts Roop Singh and Prem Sagar, electrician Shiv Shankar Dass amongst others, standing counsel Pawan Sharma informed the court that the apex court has not dropped proceedings against them and, therefore, the high court can now begin hearing the case.
In its 2006 verdict reversing the trial court acquittal of Sharma, the court had asked the hostile witnesses before it to explain why they should not be charged with perjury.
Later, the court put the proceedings - at the preliminary stage of issuance of notice - on hold because the apex court was hearing the matter. But the judges made it clear the outcome of Sharma’s appeal would decide what happens to perjury proceedings against Munshi and others.
“If he gets free, you go free; if he is convicted, you will be in trouble,” the bench warned.
Senior advocate Aman Lekhi, representing Munshi, said his client never committed any perjury and no case is made out.
“The Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court relied on Munshi’s statements to convict Manu Sharma. The proceedings against Munshi is wholly untenable and completely devoid of any justification. The perjury notice ignores settled principles of law. Certain contradictions in the statements given to police and the court do not make him a hostile witness or a dishonest one. Perjury charges are not made out. It will be challenged,” Lekhi said.
The apex court verdict had spawned strong demands for prosecuting those who turned hostile during the trial. From Jessica’s sister Sabrina Lal to socialite Bina Ramani to retired Delhi High Court judge R.S. Sodhi, all had pitched for revival of court proceedings against witnesses like Munshi, the person on whose statement the FIR was registered.
He later changed his stand in the court and introduced the “two gun theory” that led to Sharma’s acquittal in the trial court.
“You can’t allow anyone to come in, tell lies and walk off smiling from court,” was Justice Sodhi’s reaction after the apex court verdict. Sodhi was among the two judges who convicted Manu Sharma and initiated the separate perjury proceedings.
- Court resumes perjury hearings in Jessica Lall case - Feb 18, 2011
- Witnesses turning hostile has become endemic: High court (Lead) - Mar 15, 2011
- Jessica Lall case: Defence ends arguments in perjury case - Apr 19, 2011
- Court reserves order on hostile witnesses in Jessica murder case - May 04, 2011
- Jessica Lall case : Supreme Court rejects Manu Sharma's plea - Aug 10, 2010
- Jessica Lall murder trial timeline - Apr 19, 2010
- Jessica Lall case: SC upholds Delhi High Court verdict on Manu Sharma - Apr 19, 2010
- Evidence of hostile witness carries weight: Apex court - May 22, 2012
- Jessica murder case: Family hails Supreme Court verdict - Apr 19, 2010
- Parts of hostile witness's evidence can be used: Apex court (Lead) - May 22, 2012
- Acquittal of five in Shivani Bhatnagar murder case contested (Lead) - Feb 13, 2012
- (HOLD) Delay in appeal outcome no ground for exoneration in murder: SC - Sep 08, 2012
- Jessica murder: Apex court reject's Manu's plea - Aug 10, 2010
- Delhi High Court blast: Accused records statement - May 02, 2012
- Apex court to hear Kasab's plea Monday - Oct 09, 2011
Tags: apex, apex court, contradictions, conviction, court acquittal, delhi high court, delhi police, electrician, hostile witness, hostile witnesses, issuance, jessica lal, justification, manu sharma, New Delhi, perjury charges, ravindra, resumption, supreme court verdict, trial court